Maybe you should start a new thread concerning this "challenge"? This way you have more control and can edit the first post etc. We could let this one die.
This is quite time consuming and I'd rather let someone else do this.
Actually I think this thread is perfect as it is now.
OK... Chriskang, for your Excel quick-FG making thing, it works fine, except when the upgraded card has the same name as its non-upgraded counterpart, such as Eternity and Eternity.
It's not a problem. You can let unupgraded cards in your list. They'll be automatically upgraded in game.
This make arise the question: is better to try to win a FG or pu on 11 of them having to beat them all with same deck?
In the fisrt case it would be too easy, so i suggest again the second way.
Shall we make a poll?
Please, wait to see the real challenge before you say it's too easy.
I promise it'll be MUCH harder than the 11 current FG.
Question though, are we just making one deck that will face all these god creations, or are we making a deck for each god and just quitting games until we find that god?
One for each but you won't have to quit to find the god you want.
Also, it'd make it tougher if we couldn't see these fg decks beforehand forcing us to play several games until we find out what makes it tick. I'm not sure of the best way of doing it to ensure quality control but it's a thought.
I'm OK with that. There are currently 32 builds in the wiki and the last ones from Turin are not yet in.
The count will probably be higher than 50 by the end of the week.
I'll randomly (or not) peek 10 of them, rename them and maybe even make slight changes to the build. This will be close to impossible to know who is who.
If you're paranoid and absolutely don't want your deck to by published before the challenge starts, you can PM me the xls code or the build description.
This doesn't guaranty that your build will be selected for the challenge though.
