False God Proposal: Untouchable

[Demagog]

Code: [Select]

7n8 7n8 7n8 7n8 7n8 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 80a 80a 80a 80a 80d 80d 80d 80d 80e 80e 80f 80f 80g 80g 80g 80g 80g 80g 80h 80h 80h
How's that for an FG deck? All cards doubled, of course.

Edit: Blank cards are wings.

[sSethia]

If the blanked cards are Wings, I might faint. That deck is going to hurt because of the Quintessenced Phase Reclueses.

Also, using both Phase Shields and Wings are so troublesome.

All in all, I like it!!

[Demagog]

Ya they are wings. I keep forgetting that card isn't compatible yet.

[MaxMilen]

Interesting. Maybe add some Shockwaves?

[Demagog]

Not really needed... 8 thunderbolts is probably enough... besides, it really doesn't care if you have creatures out because most of them won't be able to touch it. Those that can would quickly be webbed, so the only issues would be explosions/steals/destroys/momentums. The deck takes so much stall though, that you would have to know you're playing it in order to take enough of any of those cards (or get a lucky early mutant or butterfly effect).

[smuglapse]

Just a personal preference, but remove the Phase Shields and add 1 Wings.  12 Wings = 60 turns of protection.
And because the Mark is x3, I would suggest some Elite Wyrms or Sky Dragons.

EDIT: And change name to Eliotness.   

[Retribution]

Add some damage. This deck could easily be outrushed if there is permanent removal along the way.

[Demagog]

Well phase shields block everything, wings block about half of things. And the damage isn't really necessary. It will probably have 2-3 recluses early on, and then 1-2 phase dragons mid-game. All that time it's practically unscathed. Also, it will probably often have a lot of dead cards, which means slower drawing, which means easier to deck out the opponent.

It's all theoretical though... but I would imagine it would be difficult to beat with any of the popular anti-FG decks. There's just not much of a way to test it.

[jmizzle7]

Fire/Permafrost + Oty would diminish the offensive to a crawl at best, while Pulv/BE would take care of any shields or Lobos. I would imagine this to be a moderately difficult false god, but not that bad.

[Nume]

Probably the biggest weakness of this as is would be that it has 0 perm control, and thus good rainbows could stall till they got pulv, then destroy any shields that are put out. It could be a mildly troublesome god, but still very beatable imo.

[RavingRabbid]

Code: [Select]

7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7ms 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n5 7n5 7n5 7n5 7n8 7n8 7n8 7n8 7n8 7n8 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 80g 80g 80g 80g 80h 80h 80h 80h 80h 80i 80i 80i 80s 80s 80s
Looks like we got the same idea.



I forgot, I called this Red Bull, because if you beat it Gives you Wings.

[MaxMilen]

At the risk of being accused of topic necromancy, I just wanted to justify my earlier suggestion of adding Shockwave.

True, between the main strategy and the Lightnings, Shockwave would probably not be needed. However, here are my counterpoints.

False God decks aren't supposed to be completely idealized. Even Seism, arguably the hardest FG, incorporates cards that a player usually wouldn't.At present, the Mark is ONLY fueling the Wings. It's pretty unusual for an FG to have only one card fueled by its Mark. (OK, so Seism only uses his Mark for evolving Graboids and for Rewinds, but even then, that's two different things.)

Does it necessarily have to be Shockwave that is used to make the Mark more involved in the deck? Nah. Could be a creature (such as  's Dragon), could be Eagle's Eye... but Shockwave just feels like it makes sense to me.