Hi, here's some card allocations.
What and why?I assigned cards to False Gods. Here's what I did:
0) Open
this beautiful thread
1) Remove all pillars (and pendulums from Lionheart), and remove cards with only one copy
2) Assign remaining cards to FGs, first based on highest number of copies, and then in case of a tie, higher percentage of the deck
I did this a few months ago for a forum game that I may eventually complete, in which, without giving too much away, each FG is a usable character. While there's plenty in the game's design to decide arbitrarily, I built these tables to give me a concrete reference that was easy for me to use as a framework.
Is this useful at all?Probably not. There's plenty of studies on FG card usage, most more comprehensive than this. But I found it interesting and since I have some downtime waiting for people to wake up I thought I'd share in case someone else might.
Why raw number first and percentage second? Why no single copies?For what I'm doing, I chose to use the former. For what it's worth, the distinction never matters to decide an allocation, only further down the list for four or so cards. As for single copies, I figured they weren't important enough to any FG to warrant diluting the final pool.
Any interesting trivia?The only tie not broken is Chaos Lord and Morte, who both have six RoLs in 53 cards, which is beaten by two FGs anyways.
Despite Rainbow having the most cards, she's in the group with the least (two) allocations. Neptune, at 37 cards, is the smallest in the group with the most (six) allocations.
Paradox's cheating doesn't earn it any undeserved allocations.
Why are there two spoilers?The first is sorted alphabetically by FG. The second is sorted first by cards in multiple FGs (ignoring single copies), then alphabetically by cards. All the same data, just laid out so I could look at it in two different ways without sorting it every time. I used
this tool to import them from Excel.
