Falling Empire - Round 2 Battle Results

[ZephyrPhantom]

Rebels (1 upgrade) Zblader 3 - Sevs (Sub for Firecrapper) 0 Barbarians (0 Upgrades)

by Zblader

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4vi 4vi 4vj 4vj 4vj 4vj 52q 55t 55t 55t 590 590 595 595 595 595 5c1 5c1 5fb 5v0 5v0 5v0 61q 712 8pm

He played an immo/soulcatcher/virus deck with Phoenixes and Dragons for damage. Fortunately I only saw 1 phoenix and was able to concentrate CC on the Dragons.

by Zblader

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i4 5i8 5i8 5i8 5i8 5i9 5i9 5ib 5ib 5ib 5id 5id 5id 5id 5jm 5jm 5rk 5rk 5rk 5rk 5rr 5rr 7gr 8ps

He went against me with a Grabby/Warden/Wings deck. Was a pretty normal match until he realized his deck was illegal and gave me the win.
As Sevs said, it's not fun to make decks on the fly with limitations like these.

by Zblader

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4vh 4vh 4vj 4vj 4vj 4vj 52q 590 590 590 590 595 595 5c1 5c1 5f6 5i7 5og 5og 5rk 5ur 61q 61q 7q4 8pm

Had a few issues of getting the wrong quantum for the first few turns and no nova - I guessed that he was playing with fire bolts, so I kept my 2 Graboids I played burrowed until my others creature died. He play a Phoenix at the last minute, but I drew an RT in response and used it in case he played a another firebolt (which would've decided the game).
GGs, Sevs.

[RavingRabbid]

My decks:

by RavingRabbid

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4vc 4vc 4vd 4vd 4vd 4ve 4ve 4ve 4ve 4ve 4vf 4vf 4vf 50u 50u 50u 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6u2 6u2 6u2 6u2 6u2 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 8pj

Lost by 1 hp, after not getting a creature for many turns. HE WAS LEFT WITH 1 HP, by god.

by RavingRabbid

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rh 5ro 5rt 5rt 5rt 5rt 6u2 6u2 6u2 6u2 6u2 6u2 7q1 7q1 7q4 7q4 7q4 7q4 7q4 7q4 8pj

won

The third deck was posted by Bonestorm.

Match 4/5 are also right, except that I had upped fahren instead of upped Buckler.

[The_Mormegil]

ROUND'S UP!

[MyNameIsJoey]

I am going to make a tactical retreat (forfeit) due to corruption from the Order.

So they are allowed to just forfeit like that?
Isn't refusing to play your match a form of event disruption?
What about his opponent, too? He can win this round without even being around?

Please answer, mormegil.

[Aves]

I am going to make a tactical retreat (forfeit) due to corruption from the Order.

So they are allowed to just forfeit like that?
Isn't refusing to play your match a form of event disruption?
What about his opponent, too? He can win this round without even being around?

Please answer, mormegil.

Well... would you prefer that they meet up and Zaealix plays a 24 pillar 6 holy flash deck? If he wants an auto-loss, I think there's not much you can do.

[Calindu]

I am going to make a tactical retreat (forfeit) due to corruption from the Order.

So they are allowed to just forfeit like that?
Isn't refusing to play your match a form of event disruption?
What about his opponent, too? He can win this round without even being around?

Please answer, mormegil.

We are allowed to suicide,if we want we can go into an random sub for Dj with an ilegal deck.

[MyNameIsJoey]

I am going to make a tactical retreat (forfeit) due to corruption from the Order.

So they are allowed to just forfeit like that?
Isn't refusing to play your match a form of event disruption?
What about his opponent, too? He can win this round without even being around?

Please answer, mormegil.

Well... would you prefer that they meet up and Zaealix plays a 24 pillar 6 holy flash deck? If he wants an auto-loss, I think there's not much you can do.

Thing is he has no opponent.

I am going to make a tactical retreat (forfeit) due to corruption from the Order.

So they are allowed to just forfeit like that?
Isn't refusing to play your match a form of event disruption?
What about his opponent, too? He can win this round without even being around?

Please answer, mormegil.

We are allowed to suicide,if we want we can go into an random sub for Dj with an ilegal deck.

No, Mormegil said 1 sub per round, and dj hopper was already a sub for someone else

[agentflare]

*snip*

No, Mormegil said 1 sub per round, and dj hopper was already a sub for someone else

Zaelix would've given you a free win anyways. He's allowed to forfeit in a manner.

[The_Mormegil]

The point ji412jo makes is pretty sound, though. I do not want his team to have zero chances of winning. Even though their total defeat as a team will make it tougher for him (if there were more SO members, they would have more chances), I do wish for him to have a chance. So, if somebody forfeits (and that includes obvious "illegal" decks, "not really played" matches and so on, based on my judgement) he will get half the normal upgrades. That will slow him down for two rounds, most likely (which is by far more than enough for the rest of the teams to think of something, especially if the Crime Lords start Influencing a bit more). I'm pretty happy with this ruling and I think it's pretty fair. If you have trouble with this, you can talk to me in chat or through PM.

[nilsieboy]

The point ji412jo makes is pretty sound, though. I do not want his team to have zero chances of winning. Even though their total defeat as a team will make it tougher for him (if there were more SO members, they would have more chances), I do wish for him to have a chance. So, if somebody forfeits (and that includes obvious "illegal" decks, "not really played" matches and so on, based on my judgement) he will get half the normal upgrades. That will slow him down for two rounds, most likely (which is by far more than enough for the rest of the teams to think of something, especially if the Crime Lords start Influencing a bit more). I'm pretty happy with this ruling and I think it's pretty fair. If you have trouble with this, you can talk to me in chat or through PM.

if he really wanted that the guy he betted on woulnd't "auto lose" it would be smarter to use it against opponents who'd get killed or like members of the court vs the twelve cause they wouldn't give up as they'd die.

[Jappert]

The point ji412jo makes is pretty sound, though. I do not want his team to have zero chances of winning. Even though their total defeat as a team will make it tougher for him (if there were more SO members, they would have more chances), I do wish for him to have a chance. So, if somebody forfeits (and that includes obvious "illegal" decks, "not really played" matches and so on, based on my judgement) he will get half the normal upgrades. That will slow him down for two rounds, most likely (which is by far more than enough for the rest of the teams to think of something, especially if the Crime Lords start Influencing a bit more). I'm pretty happy with this ruling and I think it's pretty fair. If you have trouble with this, you can talk to me in chat or through PM.

if he really wanted that the guy he betted on woulnd't "auto lose" it would be smarter to use it against opponents who'd get killed or like members of the court vs the twelve cause they wouldn't give up as they'd die.

You're not geting upgrades for free Nils. Rather spend your upgades on the rebels who fight for their people! Rebels stay true to their beliefs unlike the corrupt court!

[Shantu]

Nils most certainly won't get any free upgrades since I just killed him. But I agree with him, I find the rule change unnecessary. Members of the Sacred Order should find better targets.