[Weekly Challenges] What Weekly Challenge would YOU like to see us do?

[CleanOnion]

Another idea:
Design a really convoluted card.





For example:
Jumping Rope (2 ) | Trampoline (1 )
Permanent
2 : Target non-airborne creature becomes airborne for X turns (where X is Health/2) and moves upwards on the field in the Z-plane. If a creature is beneath it when it lands, both creatures take X damage.


Something really weird like that. But the description has to fit on the card. Not sure what the judging criteria would be like, maybe people vote on the most imaginative card. Or the most difficult-to-understand.

[AD TienzuStorm]

Spoiler for Hidden:

Another idea:
Design a really convoluted card.





For example:
Jumping Rope (2 ) | Trampoline (1 )
Permanent
2 : Target non-airborne creature becomes airborne for X turns (where X is Health/2) and moves upwards on the field in the Z-plane. If a creature is beneath it when it lands, both creatures take X damage.


Something really weird like that. But the description has to fit on the card. Not sure what the judging criteria would be like, maybe people vote on the most imaginative card. Or the most difficult-to-understand.

Interesting, but the WCs are typically the promote good card designing, and making overly complex cards that cram effects into the limited space isn't necessarily good designing per se.

[Monox D. I-Fly]

My suggestion is to make invisibility remover mass CC for each elements which don't have. So far we have:
, , , and

Btw, I am surprised that doesn't remove invisibility.

[AD TienzuStorm]

My suggestion is to make invisibility remover mass CC for each elements which don't have.

I think somebody made this kind of suggestion before in this thread (about making a twelve element series). I'll answer the same way here as I did then.

Making one card is fine. Two cards is a bit iffy, but still doable.

But, making more than that is overly tedious (especially with the fact that this'll be a series that consists of cards that essentially are the same card but with elemental themes attached) and is a bit of a turn off for designers due to the amount of work that would be attached to a normally five minute thing every week.

Your idea could be interesting as just design one card though.

[ZephyrPhantom]

Spoiler for Hidden:

Another idea:
Design a really convoluted card.





For example:
Jumping Rope (2 ) | Trampoline (1 )
Permanent
2 : Target non-airborne creature becomes airborne for X turns (where X is Health/2) and moves upwards on the field in the Z-plane. If a creature is beneath it when it lands, both creatures take X damage.


Something really weird like that. But the description has to fit on the card. Not sure what the judging criteria would be like, maybe people vote on the most imaginative card. Or the most difficult-to-understand.

Interesting, but the WCs are typically the promote good card designing, and making overly complex cards that cram effects into the limited space isn't necessarily good designing per se.

I'm actually in favor of this challenge if it's done right. For example, "Design a card with 3 mechanics." or "Design a card with 3 abilities." At face value, it'd be stupendously hard and impractical but I'm sure there are overly complex cards in MtG that execute rather gracefully - YGO definitely has some, so EtG design definitely can handle it too.

[Monox D. I-Fly]

Your idea could be interesting as just design one card though.

That's the intended meaning of my post. People will be free to choose whether they will make one for  ,  ,  , or the other elements.

[kirbylover314]

Btw, I am surprised that doesn't remove invisibility.

It actually does. Check . For some reason the text is missing on the unupped.

[Monox D. I-Fly]

It actually does. Check . For some reason the text is missing on the unupped.

Or... does the unupped simply not do that?

[ddevans96]

It does, you can test it. Just missing text for some odd reason.

[Monox D. I-Fly]

I see. It does weird if a Dry Spell and a Plague can tear off the Cloak but a Thunderstorm can't.

[CleanOnion]

Design a card that's limited by the opponent having Sanctuary?

[AD TienzuStorm]

Design a card that's limited by the opponent having Sanctuary?

So.. Basically make a HC or QC card?

Oh wait.

Ooh, maybe have it be like Solar Shield and Dissipation Shield! I liek now.

EDIT: Oh "opponent having Sanct".

Well that can always change, or I could make a new suggestion for just "having a Sanct in play".