[Old] How to Post A Card Idea

[ddevans96]

Most likely i'll try to modify the (new) quantum pillar.  I have a vague notion of trying to create a hybrid picture of two or more of the other pillars, but i'm expecting that attempt to fail.

Is there somewhere i can find the old pillar art?  I would consider using that as a base instead if i knew where to find it.

Also i just started downloading spore and i'll give that a try.

The new Quantum Pillar is made by vrt. All the old pillar art can be found in the avatar gallery.

[Chromatophore]

Thank you

[Jocko]

Does this mean that cards that works with pseudoquanta (blood pillars and pends come to mind) should've been in this new repository?

[XYTWO]

Does this mean that cards that works with pseudoquanta (blood pillars and pends come to mind) should've been in this new repository?

Not necessarily. If it can be typed out (i.e. "quanta of your opponent's mark" vs. "Copy quanta") then it doesn't fall under psuedoquanta rulings.

[TimerClock14]

Note: a roundabout way of getting your should-be repository card into the actual repository is to request that it be removed from the polls, remake it, and submit it to the repository.

[Hyroen]

Recently I created a Pseudoquanta thread for Mirror Quanta and intentionally broke one of the rules listed HERE (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,5039.msg56336.html#post_PQ). My poll does not have exactly 2 options.

My reasoning behind this is that while some people may not like the concept behind your particular Pseudoquanta, they may enjoy other Pseudoquanta more. Some members of the community may not like the concept of Pseudoquanta at all and by default vote against it. This may create a bias for the "No, I don't like it." response.

May this be permitted?

[TimerClock14]

Recently I created a Pseudoquanta thread for Mirror Quanta and intentionally broke one of the rules listed HERE (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,5039.msg56336.html#post_PQ). My poll does not have exactly 2 options.

My reasoning behind this is that while some people may not like the concept behind your particular Pseudoquanta, they may enjoy other Pseudoquanta more. Some members of the community may not like the concept of Pseudoquanta at all and by default vote against it. This may create a bias for the "No, I don't like it." response.

May this be permitted?

No. The rules state that there must be exactly 2 options. This was put in place to avoid any kind of bias, to please the skeptics and it makes the curator's job easier.
It also helps filter the amount of quality ideas that are put into the repository. The curator who is reviewing your card will decide, based on your poll and the posts on your topic whether or not there is enough public interest in your idea to put it into the repository.

EDIT: If someone votes No on your poll from a global disliking of repository-based ideas, they had absolutely no grounds to vote in the first place. The poll is meant to decide if there is public interest in the idea itself not the category that was made for it.

[Hyroen]

Fair enough. ^_^

EDIT: Fixed.

[TimerClock14]

Just so I clear up any misunderstandings, the Repository was not made specifically for pseudoquanta. It was made for any and all types of cards that cannot be classified as  or "other."

[ddevans96]

Just so I clear up any misunderstandings, the Repository was not made specifically for pseudoquanta. It was made for any and all types of cards that cannot be classified as  or "other."

Would that include Zblader's old Duality Series?

[TimerClock14]

Just so I clear up any misunderstandings, the Repository was not made specifically for pseudoquanta. It was made for any and all types of cards that cannot be classified as  or "other."

Would that include Zblader's old Duality Series?

Yes.

[TimerClock14]

NOTICE: Repository is under temporary construction for various reasons. If you notice a seemingly random change applied to anything related with it, this is normal.