On vagman's deck versus Darkness. Currently he wants this:
4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vf 4vf 4vf 4vf 4vf 4vf 4vl 4vl 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 61q 61q 61q 61q 621 621 621 621
I have some serious problems with this deck choice. We beat Darkness last round cleanly with Scrambled Shriekers, largely because the Earthquakes from those decks denied them. They are aware of that, so I think it's pretty likely they would play something that resists EQ, like Devourers or mono-Darkness or maybe Dark-Earth duo with Enchant Artifact (although that is unlikely). The most probable thing for them to do is play Devourers ... and yet vagman's deck has basically no chance against Devourers.
We should not be playing a slow, expensive deck against them which has half of our Purple Dragons that we would lose if we lose this match, leaving 6 in our vault (and it's impossible that we would ever salvage more). Also if we lose, we would lose FOURTEEN, = 14, quanta sources.
We should be playing a diverse deck with different cards that minimizes the damage if we lose ... like SS again with fewer Earthquakes and more CC, something designed to counter Devourers. Or even a deck like 10men's above -- Darkness vs. Darkness could actually be quite effective I think.