my 1st published entropy deck [UNUPPED]

[vidurkhanna]

by vidurkhanna

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vd 4vd 4ve 4ve 4ve 4vf 4vf 4vf 4vg 4vg 4vl 4vn 4vn 4vn 8pj

this is the 1st deck that i have ever published in the forums!!   

so here are the stats :

i played this deck 20 times in the bronze league arena and the score was 17/20 ( won 17 lost 3)
i won 11 cards including 1 farenheit  ( rare weapon ) from a rare spin! (this deck gave me 2 rare spins!

after 20 matches , i won 351  { cha - ching }
i forgot to keep a track of the score    but it has gone up by atleast 200 points   8) !

win % = 85 % (not bAd eh?? )
QI = between 5 and 6! 

all u have to do is play the creatures as soon as possible and antimatter the opponents dragons/high damage cards!

maxwells demons are really big lifesavers here when u dont have an antimatter!

but take care that diisipation sheild uses a minimum of 1  for every creature the opponent has so try to have as much  quanta available when u play it!!
discord = i dont think i have to explain myself there 

p.s. i had 7 elemental mastery wins in the bronze league arena!!

p.p.s.  An Error Has Occurred! You are not allowed to search for posts in this forum. so i could not check if this deck has been posted b4!

p.p.p.s. my total score now is 1482

[Djhopper :)]

by Djhopper :)

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vd 4vd 4ve 4ve 4ve 4vf 4vf 4vf 4vg 4vg 4vl 4vn 4vn 4vn 8pj

by Djhopper :)

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vd 4vd 4vd 4ve 4ve 4ve 4ve 4ve 4vf 4vf 4vf 4vl 4vn 4vn 4vn 4vn 4vn 4vn 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 8pj

-More damage
-More Maxwells (because they own fire)
-More anti-matter (slows so many decks MASSIVELY)
-Less quanta, so more stall-like (Q- Wait a moment, with MORE DAMAGE? A- Yeah.)

[TribalTrouble]

Although that deck has more damage it has so little quanta generation where as the other deck has a very good amount of pillars.
Source: http://www.quantum-index.com/qi.php?deckCode=4vc+4vc+4vc+4vc+4vc+4vc+4vd+4vd+4vd+4ve+4ve+4ve+4ve+4ve+4vf+4vf+4vf+4vl+4vn+4vn+4vn+4vn+4vn+4vn+50u+50u+50u+50u+50u+50u+8pj&showImage=1

[Djhopper :)]

Although that deck has more damage it has so little quanta generation where as the other deck has a very good amount of pillars.
Source: http://www.quantum-index.com/qi.php?deckCode=4vc+4vc+4vc+4vc+4vc+4vc+4vd+4vd+4vd+4ve+4ve+4ve+4ve+4ve+4vf+4vf+4vf+4vl+4vn+4vn+4vn+4vn+4vn+4vn+50u+50u+50u+50u+50u+50u+8pj&showImage=1

QI is NOT the ultimate way to test a deck.

This deck plays slow and therefore has more time to get quanta, just like rushes need more quanta because they have less time to get it.

[vidurkhanna]

but QI is a very important part of a deck!!

u could have more damage but not enough quanta to play out ur full damage cards!!

and y pendulums if its a mono deck?
i dont understand the logic there!

i mean its a mono deck , pillars cost 6 electrum while pendulums cost 24 electrum!
in a mono deck thats 18 gold wasted!

[bripod]

EARTHQUAKE!

that's why...

[vidurkhanna]

LOL 

but earthquake can only destroy 3 pillars my deck has 16 pillars , djs deck has 6 pillars and 7 pendulums!

[Sevs]

LOL 

but earthquake can only destroy 3 pillars my deck has 16 pillars , djs deck has 6 pillars and 7 pendulums!

right but lets say you have 3 pillars in a stack and dj's deck has 2 pillars and 1 pendulum. EQ destroys 3 quanta producers in 1 case and 2 in the other.

[Elbirn]

I've been fiddling with entropy as well. It's growing on me. ;P Here's the deck I'm running, inspired by this thread. I'm in the process of upgrading it to make a consistent low level farmer. If you do decide to make a deck like this and upgrade it, do NOT upgrade your abominations or dissipation shields.

Strategy is simple, antimatter enemies, throw up the dissipation shield to stop enemy damage completely and stall for heals from aforementioned antimattered enemies. Play purple nymph if you can get her early, if not, rush and don't give a dang about getting em's.

I'd like for the deck to have more dragons, antimatters, nymphs, maxwells...But quite frankly the deck is too big as is, and I don't want to make it any bulkier. This seems to give a good balance the way it is now, though I'm sure there's room for improvement.

by Elbirn

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vd 4vd 4ve 4ve 4ve 4vf 4vf 4vf 4vg 4vg 4vl 4vl 4vn 4vn 4vn 500 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 8pj

Stats for the first 40 bronze games I played, keep in mind that had I kept keeping stats, particularly after starting to upgrade a bit, they'd be much better. I honestly feel the stats aren't as indicative of how much success I've had, but *shrug* numbers are numbers, can't dispute them.

Mono entropy Bronze testing
Win/Loss:       32/8 (one deck out due to encountering another mono entropy…)
Turns to win: 13.625 Turn record: 11, 9, 10, 16, 16, 11, 18, 15, 9, 12, 12, 17, 13, 14, 19, 10, 16, 14, 13, 17, 14, 15, 9, 7, 18, 16, 13, 11, 14, 20, 18, 9
2 rare spin
12 EM (20man beaten with em, rank 2 bronze!)

Mono entropy Silver testing: 10/6, 13.1 ttw. UNFINISHED TESTING.
16, 18, 11, 12, 13, 12, 11, 9, 13, 16
1 EM
1 rare spin

[JonathanCrazyJ]

I love how enthusiastic the OP is lol makes me smile.

Seems a solid deck, always split the pillars / pendulums in a mono deck, it doesnt affect play at all and directly makes is slightly stronger.

QI should be around 5. I agree that SOME stall decks need slightly lower to work optimally, but this is not one of them. This is intended as a controlled deck, not a stall deck, and trying to power maxwells...
Generally you should count 2 uses of a creature skill into QI, i wont count that for each maxwell, just for one. Elbirn your deck is just SLIGHTLY quanta starved. its always hard with unupped decks but i would suggest taking out an AM... u will still be a little short but i think it would make the deck just a little more stable.