77j 77j 77j 7t4 7t4 7t4 7t4 7t4 7t4 7t4 7t4 7t6 7t6 7t6 7t6 7t6 7t6 7t9 7ta 7tb 7tc 7te 7te 7te 7tf 7tf 7tf 7tf 7tf 7tf 8pm
you sooooo copied the title from essence...
Quote from: TheIdioticIdiot on February 23, 2011, 03:16:10 pmyou sooooo copied the title from essence...Did not! I've never seen his. Since 2/2 posts are about the name, I'll change it to something way less creative.
Quote from: kirchj33 on February 23, 2011, 03:30:31 pmQuote from: TheIdioticIdiot on February 23, 2011, 03:16:10 pmyou sooooo copied the title from essence...Did not! I've never seen his. Since 2/2 posts are about the name, I'll change it to something way less creative.Heh, considering all the Balls decks that are getting posted I don't think original names are a prime concern for the community in general.The deck looks solid overall. Personally I wouldn't mind seeing 1 or 2 more Steals, but I don't think it's critical to the deck's success.
Quote from: willng3 on February 23, 2011, 03:38:43 pmQuote from: kirchj33 on February 23, 2011, 03:30:31 pmQuote from: TheIdioticIdiot on February 23, 2011, 03:16:10 pmyou sooooo copied the title from essence...Did not! I've never seen his. Since 2/2 posts are about the name, I'll change it to something way less creative.Heh, considering all the Balls decks that are getting posted I don't think original names are a prime concern for the community in general.The deck looks solid overall. Personally I wouldn't mind seeing 1 or 2 more Steals, but I don't think it's critical to the deck's success.You could go -1 vamp dagger +1 steal, but the idea is they won't get much on the field.
Quote from: kirchj33 on February 23, 2011, 03:41:34 pmQuote from: willng3 on February 23, 2011, 03:38:43 pmQuote from: kirchj33 on February 23, 2011, 03:30:31 pmQuote from: TheIdioticIdiot on February 23, 2011, 03:16:10 pmyou sooooo copied the title from essence...Did not! I've never seen his. Since 2/2 posts are about the name, I'll change it to something way less creative.Heh, considering all the Balls decks that are getting posted I don't think original names are a prime concern for the community in general.The deck looks solid overall. Personally I wouldn't mind seeing 1 or 2 more Steals, but I don't think it's critical to the deck's success.You could go -1 vamp dagger +1 steal, but the idea is they won't get much on the field.Well the main incentive was just to have more chances of drawing a Steal just in case something did slip through the denial wall, such as SoGs in PvP for instance, but in an AI3 atmosphere it wouldn't be necessary. I'd keep it the way it is though; it's not important enough of an issue to change anything really.