V2 -- fire tweaked to max speed

[~Napalm]

(...)
fixed ^^
(...)

Double fixed!

[EliteEsoteric]

Heh I just beat Incarnate with this deck. I got him on my oracle, and didnt feel like switching decks, and figured with the infection mechanics and how they effect growing creatures I'd have a chance. And sure enough, I won . Admittedly one bone wall wouldve screwed me, but I've noticed in the past he pretty much always plays yards over walls so a good rush can beat the walls out generally.
(http://imageplay.net/)

Clicked false god by accident when I was t50 farming, and beat decay with this. (albeit not a fully upgraded version)

(http://imageplay.net/view/m7Gbd99227/Screen_shot_2010_10_25_at_1.51)

[~Napalm]

Decay is a sissy to Fire Rushes. I'm 6 - 1 Against him. (3 Siphon Life turn 1, and then every time I played anything else until he had used 6... then came the eclipse, not much I could do...)

[willng3]

Decay is a sissy to Fire Rushes. I'm 6 - 1 Against him. (3 Siphon Life turn 1, and then every time I played anything else until he had used 6... then came the eclipse, not much I could do...)

Truth.  Decay gets owned so badly by PhoeniXplosion.

[Syoxis]

Mmm... yes... the modified version with explosions puts the t50 in their place (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,6960.0.html)
(...)

fixed ^^

nice rush on EP, solaris.

btw. in elements glossary 1 turn = end turn/pressing space
this deck can pull out 3tk (3turn kills), but it is still unlikely -> i had not a single 3tk in a 200 testserie.
i dont wanna say you didnt had some 3tk, but sometimes ppl count turns on different ways.

I have also been using this deck for a while and had yet to see a true 3tk, until just now.  Here is how it happened
I went second, which may have been the key.

T1: Ball Lightning > Cremation > Phoenix > Cremation (now at 16 fire) > dragon, lava destroyer, gavel > 26 damage (1 fire left)
T2: I have a cremation left from last turn and draw a lava destroyer.... Res phoenix > Cremation (9 fire now) > play lava destroyer, pump LD from last turn > 35 damage (61 total, 4 fire left)
T3: I draw a phoenix.... Res phoenix, play second phoenix, pump LD, pump LD > 47 damage (108 total)

I did not even need that last phoenix.  There you have it. 

[TheMartyr24]

Why not using the Ruby dragon instead of crimson dragon?
Is it cost too much quanta? 

[Pwnator]

Why not using the Ruby dragon instead of crimson dragon?
Is it cost too much quanta? 

HP issues.

[willng3]

Why not using the Ruby dragon instead of crimson dragon?
Is it cost too much quanta? 

Yes, the quanta.  This deck is entirely about speed, and though Ruby Dragon is a powerhouse all in itself, the extra quanta required to play it causes it to slow you down by not being able to play it for a few turns.  Crimson Dragon does not have these same issues.  Given this does not always occur, but we're looking for more consistency in a deck like this.

[2004030]

This is yet another FG defeat:
(http://imageplay.net/view/m7Gbd101478/Miracle)
I love this deck!!!

Edit: Luck!
(http://imageplay.net/view/m7Gbd101480/Ferox)
(http://imageplay.net/view/m7Gbd101488/Fire_Queen)

2nd Edit:
My modification, I think it worth it.

Code: [Select]

5f2 5f2 5f2 61p 61p 61p 61p 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7ds 7ds 7ds 7f2 7tb

[TheCrazyMango]

any reason to use BL over photons?

[Lluis83]

any reason to use BL over photons?

Because you BL deals 5 damage, and you usually win before 6 turns, so it is not very probably to do 6 damage with a photon(and it can be killed)

[TheCrazyMango]

but you dont ever leave the BL out. im testing a version with photons and sometimes i just play them and leave them until i get a creamation