unupgraded darklife devosis [Recommended for A1 3 and PVP1]

[wakeside]

heyy i just made a deck its a mix between darkness and life , i call it darklife devosis.

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5c6 5c6 5c6 5c9 5c9 5c9 5c9 5c9 5ul 5ul 5ul 5um 5um 5um 5um 5um 5um 5up 5up 606 606 606 606 606 606 606 606 606 606 606 8pn

Information:
This is a deck i thought of while experimenting with devourers. The deck is composed of 30 cards which makes is super light and reliable.
11 pendulums are used so that there is a good chance of drawing them.
2 steals are used here so that any weapons or shields that the opponent has used can be disabled.
6 devourers are used here to help accumulate quanta to help fuel the dragons when they are under mitosis.
3 black dragons are used because a lot of quanta would accumulate from the devourers.
5 mitosis are used because they can be used on the devourers so that they are in plentiful stock and drain the opponent and it is also used for dragons when your quanta is inn plentiful stock and the game is nearing an end.
3 empathetic bonds are used as a way to generate health. In my pilot test for this deck i had three empathetic bonds out and a full field of creatures so i got 21 x 3 health

How to use:
this deck is relatively easy to use. all you have to do is get your devourers out as soon as possible and get them mitosisized. after that all you have to do is duplicate the creatures and win! simple.

any suggestions would be helpfull and this is still a working progress

[Chapuz]

It's a very good deck and actually the first mitodragon powered by devtosis I've seen.
I tweaked it a bit so it can have an extra Steal and Bond, using  mark just in case you start with a single pendulum. I didn't lose any game because of lack defense in my few tests, but a Steal can be replaced for a Dusk shield if you feel it needs it.

*Deck deleted because it was just worse than the posted one*

[Opsinis]

^^^^ Chaps, the only problem I have with that is that the earliest you're going to get a devourer is turn 3.
I know denial isn't the main idea, it's just a bonus to getting tons of dark quanta for mitodragon. But I feel an earlier devourer would be good.
Sooo.... Maybe dark pends are good.

[wakeside]

i found that a nightfall actually benefits the user in the event that that whole field is covered in devourers. for example 21 devourers would give 21 damage a turn and with eclipse you would get a 42 damage rate while also draining the opponent of their quanta. whats more is that you can also get 21 health per round if you have just one empathic bond you would get 21 health and with three in my deck i would get 63 health a round

[Chapuz]

i found that a nightfall actually benefits the user in the event that that whole field is covered in devourers. for example 21 devourers would give 21 damage a turn and with eclipse you would get a 42 damage rate while also draining the opponent of their quanta. whats more is that you can also get 21 health per round if you have just one empathic bond you would get 21 health and with three in my deck i would get 63 health a round

What would you suggest taking out for a pair of nightfalls?

The idea of this deck is leave the oponent without many creatures and no quanta at all and a decent healing, and in mid-late game when you finish locking the oponent you start mitosing the dragons.

[Helston]

That's just about the ideal deck for devtosis. I've used it a bit since the last War (where we used Life Pendulums being on team Life). Nightfalls aren't really necessary. Although they can add to your damage by 23, there's no room for them. Three Emphatic Bonds is just enough to make sure you have one by mid-game where you should have a decent number of Devourers, five Mitosis (what on earth is the plural there?) and six devourers is the right set up for the denial, two steals are good for either sanctuaries, pillar/pendulum stealing or getting rid of an Owl's Eye, and more than 3 dragons isn't needed (two can be used too, but leaves you a little more susceptible to CC and bad draws).

I would, however recommend adding one pendulum. With 31 cards you suddenly have the option of a deckout if for whatever reason you can't kill your opponent. A field full of creatures still yields 69 healing (you can have 23 creatures on the field, not 21) which is usually enough to out-stall 30 card decks and 11 pendulums is only just enough quanta generation, so a twelfth is always handy.

[mikpj]

I really love this deck but vs stronger decks (silver league) it takes too long to gain control.

[Chapuz]

I really live this deck but vs stronger decks (silver league) it takes too long to gain control.

It's recommended for Bronze only, because 2x draw rushes are much faster than this deck and almost no one in bronze gets 2x draw.

[rainbo]

Question: why the bonds over 3 heals? I thought heals would be more likely for an EM.

[Chapuz]

Question: why the bonds over 3 heals? I thought heals would be more likely for an EM.

It's a stall deck, the devourers take several turns to let you win enough  quanta to play some dragons. Therefore, if the oponent manages to take a pair of mid attackers out, you would probably lose. In a long game, those bonds heal more than 60 HP. The point of the deck is to win, not mainly to EM.