That Really Rustles My Jimmies [Life|Light][AI3]

[Elbirn]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

7ad 7ad 7ad 7ad 7ad 7ad 7ae 7ae 7ae 7ae 7ae 7ae 7af 7af 7af 7af 7af 7af 7ag 7ag 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jt 7jt 8pn

Spoiler for Hidden:

I got bored.
Also, I'm sure this is nothing original. But it's really fun. I suppose if you don't draw a rustler, you're screwed, but I've yet to have that happen. Undefeated against AI3, 9-1 against halfbloods, but this is all in the trainer, and I hear tell that the AI isn't up to date in there, so take it with a grain of salt.

[Ilias22]

Not bad...If i am not wrong you used something like this but unupped in Bl...Why dont you replace some of the creatures for heals?

[Lluis83]

Nice deck.

[Elbirn]

Not bad...If i am not wrong you used something like this but unupped in Bl...Why dont you replace some of the creatures for heals?

Because rush.
And kinda, I played you with a life rush with a similar idea, but with less creatures and more of other crap. It had scorps, as you saw, whereas this replaces them with frogs because of their increased damage in upped play. I also had a split on  life towers/pends and a  mark. This is much more reliant on rustlers, but is much faster.

[pulli23]

I'd swap out the cockatrice with either 2 adrenaline or 2 emphatic bonds..

[Elbirn]

adrenaline doesn't really sync very well with the attack power of the creatures in this deck though. a frog (5 attack) with epinephrine played on it will do a total of 6 more damage, and the dragons (12 attack) will do 4 additional damage. Rustlers (1 attack) would do only 3 additional damage,

So basically...

Epinephrine
Pros: More attacks = stronger against bone wall
Cons: Less creatures = more susceptible to CC, more attacks = weaker to fire buckler

Matter of taste, all in all. I prefer the two out of place cockatrices.

Bonds could work, but I've never really run into a game where I find myself worrying about my health. The opponent's generally dead before me. ;P

[Chapuz]

You will have plenty of , why not mitosis dragons?

[Ilias22]

Not bad...If i am not wrong you used something like this but unupped in Bl...Why dont you replace some of the creatures for heals?

Because rush.
And kinda, I played you with a life rush with a similar idea, but with less creatures and more of other crap. It had scorps, as you saw, whereas this replaces them with frogs because of their increased damage in upped play. I also had a split on  life towers/pends and a  mark. This is much more reliant on rustlers, but is much faster.

Yes,you are right...Anyway really good deck

[Elbirn]

Looking back on this... What if I did -6 Light towers +6 RoL? Also, the solar bucklers are there just as much for  production as defense. What if I took one out and put in a luciferin? I have plenty of no skill creatures after all. Aaaand finally, with that much more  quanta being produced, in turn creating so much more  quanta, perhaps I really should do -2 cockatrices and +2 mitosis?

[Rutarete]

Looking back on this... What if I did -6 Light towers +6 RoL? Also, the solar bucklers are there just as much for  production as defense. What if I took one out and put in a luciferin? I have plenty of no skill creatures after all. Aaaand finally, with that much more  quanta being produced, in turn creating so much more  quanta, perhaps I really should do -2 cockatrices and +2 mitosis?

Sounds like a good change to me.

[Elbirn]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

6rk 7ad 7ad 7ad 7ad 7ad 7ae 7ae 7ae 7ae 7ae 7ae 7af 7af 7af 7af 7af 7af 7ap 7ap 7jo 7jo 7jp 7jp 7jp 7jp 7jp 7jp 7k3 7k3 8pn

After some tweaking, this is what I've got. I think I'm gonna try to get some stats for this. Again, I'm a nubbin without the upped cards for it, but playing this in trainer after 10 games I'm looking at a mean of 6.5 TTW. I know that's not incredibly impressive, but this deck has the potential to win in 5 turns. The mode and median = 5 TTW for the record.