Quantum? Who needs that?

[Celidion]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

77j 77j 77j 77j 7t4 7t4 7t4 7t4 7t4 7t4 7t4 7t4 7t6 7t6 7t6 7t6 7t6 7t6 7t8 7t9 7t9 7ta 7tb 7tc 7tc 7tc 7tf 7tf 7tf 7tf 8pm

Really pleased on how this turned out. This is probably going to be my new pvp deck, as it has my two favorite elements. I actually don't know how I could improve this. Thoughts?

[Selenbrant]

Vamped Gargoyle? Since he has this synergy(hp bonus) you should use it regardless of whether you really need it or not.

[jmdt]

I made a similar deck to this before, but with more emphasis on earth.  Quicksand/Pest decks are very fun decks.

[Celidion]

Vamped Gargoyle? Since he has this synergy(hp bonus) you should use it regardless of whether you really need it or not.

I want to keep it 30 cards, try to fit in 2-4 LS without taking out valuable cards.

[Selenbrant]

Cant really use QI here because of Pest, but if you take 2 towers out?

[jmdt]

Cant really use QI here because of Pest, but if you take 2 towers out?

8 dark towers is already pretty light for this deck even including the pests.  6 would make it very difficult to get going.

[tinkady]

i had the pest/vamp/LS idea, and worked it all out in my head. then i realized that a LS'ed vamp is a 7 power vamp for 8 and 1 , taking 2 cards and 2 turns to set up. vampire is a 4 power vamp for 5 .  the gargoyle is more powerful for sure, but much more inefficient to set up. with an eclipse out, theres less difference in power. might as well go with vamps and use the extra card space. so LS is a no
also, ive never really played a deck like this so i could be totally wrong, but should you pack 2 ellipses? good to get those early/have a backup

[DevilLoss]

this deck seems solid but i think vamps would be better over gargoyles

[jmdt]

this deck seems solid but i think vamps would be better over gargoyles

Gargoyles are for synergy with earth mark and are much harder to kill.