Rotten Flesh [Bronze]

[Chapuz]

Unupped, rareless, fun and effective. It doesn't rock, it bones.

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

52h 52h 52h 52h 52h 52h 52i 52i 52i 52i 52i 52i 52p 52p 52r 52r 52r 52r 52v 52v 52v 52v 52v 52v 61p 61p 61p 61p 61p 61p 8pk

Having at least 12 dying creatures without Fractal makes the job much easier than other  decks.

Spoiler for tips:

This deck is NOT newbie friendly, so this must be written:

Take advantage of the death effects

Playing a Bone Wall is always priority against plating a dragon.
Sometimes you will have to wait 1-2 turns for a 1st-2nd soul catcher, discard extra bone walls if you can.
If you see that the oponent will have low HP creatures, use the Sparks to fuel the wall if you can. Virus is used to provoke more than 1 death effect, try to use them after the wall is played.
In risky cases, you will have to target your own virus and sparks with another virus to keep the wall growing. Dim Shield spammers are an example.

Against mono fire (usually 6+ CC and PC), with some skill you can make the AI target the bone wall with his Explotions and the Virus with the Rage Pots. In early game, don't play more than 2 soul catchers at the same time.
Lobotomizer is nasty, as soon as you see one of them play kill all your virus (sometimes targetting other virus) and play 2 virus at the same time, to target the lobo'd one with the active one.

Enjoy!

[Fayceless]

40-4?  I just went 2-4.     I think it's proof that the RNG hates me.  I mean really, really hates me.  It's a nice deck, though.  I wonder if a graveyard or 2 might be helpful...I don't like the Sparks filling up my first hand instead of Soul Catchers, not sure what would be done about that, though.

[Chapuz]

40-4?  I just went 2-4.     I think it's proof that the RNG hates me.  I mean really, really hates me.  It's a nice deck, though.  I wonder if a graveyard or 2 might be helpful...I don't like the Sparks filling up my first hand instead of Soul Catchers, not sure what would be done about that, though.

At the beginning, play the virus just with the quanta gained by your mark and discard the extra bonewalls.

[freemod1espilon]

how well is it at grinding Ai3?

[bogtro]

I don't see how this is possibly any better than straight up death rush (4 drag, 6 mummy, 6 poison, 14 pillar). It's far slower and doesn't really contain enough defense to outstall a death rush.

Using simulator,
Player 1 [Your deck]
Wins: 49
Winrate: 4.9 %
Average TTW: 9.551020408163266
EMs: 0
EM rate: 0 %

Player 2 [Normal death rush]
Wins: 951
Winrate: 95.1 %
Average TTW: 8.121976866456361
EMs: 0
EM rate: 0 %

Of course the AI isn't very good with this deck most likely, but 4.9% winrate against a normal death rush is strange.

[Chapuz]

@bogtro
This deck is NOT newbie friendly and you can't expect an AI plays it good. Sparks must be played only to fuel the wall or to feed it, virus target varies with the situation and most of the times you wait with the virus in the field before killing every virus for a sheety creature. And it has a lot of defense, remember you have AT LEAST 12 dying creatures.

[bogtro]

Sorry, I meant that there's no possibility of this being anywhere near something called a "death rush." There is no "rush" in this deck at all. The name is very misleading, particularly to beginners who think that the "2.0" implies this is better than normal death rush, which it certainly is not.

[Chapuz]

Sorry, I meant that there's no possibility of this being anywhere near something called a "death rush." There is no "rush" in this deck at all.

Yeah well, I didn't know how to name it xD

[bogtro]

Sorry, I meant that there's no possibility of this being anywhere near something called a "death rush." There is no "rush" in this deck at all.

Yeah well, I didn't know how to name it xD

The current name is terribly misleading, as "Death Rush" implies rush, something this deck is not, and "2.0" suggests better than regular death rush, which this deck also is not.

[Chapuz]

Sorry, I meant that there's no possibility of this being anywhere near something called a "death rush." There is no "rush" in this deck at all.

Yeah well, I didn't know how to name it xD

The current name is terribly misleading, as "Death Rush" implies rush, something this deck is not, and "2.0" suggests better than regular death rush, which this deck also is not.

Right, name changed. Thanks Minecraft! =)

[DigitalHero07]

Which card do I sacrifice at the beginning, virus or sparks?

[Chapuz]

Which card do I sacrifice at the beginning, virus or sparks?

Sparks, as you will want virus to cause an aditional death to fuel the wall =)