Rotten Flesh [Bronze]

[FreeRainer]

Thx for the Update. But still: 8 looses 2 wins

2 times drawing death, because no catcher or salvager
3 times deck destroyed with devaurer and steal
2 times poison killed
1 loosing because of 6 dimensional shields

[Chapuz]

no catchers is actually hard to see

[FreeRainer]

Is there a anti-poison deck somehwere in the forum? I feel like every third fight in bronze is against Poison decks.

[Chapuz]

any deck with healing or purify

[TribalTrouble]

Maybe if you do a YouTube video of yourself showing everyone how to use this deck we will all know how to get 40-4 lol.

[wumbla]

Old version is WAY better, because you can play viruses with the death quanta from your mark.
With the newer version, you can't even get the viruses out on the field without playing a phase salvager first.
I replaced one of the dragons for an arsenic and it did pretty well, not 40-4 though.
The arsenic comes in handy early game if the deck has mass CC against your dragons.

[JednorozecCZ]

It just seems weak to me. With bad draw you are quickly done bro. But nice try to use salagers though

[UnderneathTheLens]

Old version is WAY better, because you can play viruses with the death quanta from your mark.
With the newer version, you can't even get the viruses out on the field without playing a phase salvager first.
I replaced one of the dragons for an arsenic and it did pretty well, not 40-4 though.
The arsenic comes in handy early game if the deck has mass CC against your dragons.

Agreed. Salvagers are completely pointless in this deck :/

[Drake_XIV]

Old version is WAY better, because you can play viruses with the death quanta from your mark.
With the newer version, you can't even get the viruses out on the field without playing a phase salvager first.
I replaced one of the dragons for an arsenic and it did pretty well, not 40-4 though.
The arsenic comes in handy early game if the deck has mass CC against your dragons.

Agreed. Salvagers are completely pointless in this deck :/

You mean for more death effects?

[UnderneathTheLens]

Old version is WAY better, because you can play viruses with the death quanta from your mark.
With the newer version, you can't even get the viruses out on the field without playing a phase salvager first.
I replaced one of the dragons for an arsenic and it did pretty well, not 40-4 though.
The arsenic comes in handy early game if the deck has mass CC against your dragons.

Agreed. Salvagers are completely pointless in this deck :/

You mean for more death effects?

The point of using Salvagers is for some Permanent Protection. That is obviously not going to happen here. For pure death effects, Sparks are much better in this case.

[eaglgenes101]

Old version is WAY better, because you can play viruses with the death quanta from your mark.
With the newer version, you can't even get the viruses out on the field without playing a phase salvager first.
I replaced one of the dragons for an arsenic and it did pretty well, not 40-4 though.
The arsenic comes in handy early game if the deck has mass CC against your dragons.

Agreed. Salvagers are completely pointless in this deck :/

You mean for more death effects?

The point of using Salvagers is for some Permanent Protection. That is obviously not going to happen here. For pure death effects, Sparks are much better in this case.

Don't forget preventing mulligan screwups. It's not pleasant to have no soul catchers in your hand.

[LapizDragon]

I'm using this deck in bronze, and I'm kind of wondering what the point of the salvagers is, outside of mulligan manipulation. It was easier to use the 0-cost sparks and the quanta from your mark to get viruses. Outside of assuring more soulcatchers, what's the point of the salvagers?