*Author

MrSexington

  • Guest
MrSexington's "Don't Cross the Streams" Deck https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=3942.msg38277#msg38277
« on: March 14, 2010, 08:08:04 pm »
MrSexington's "Don't Cross the Streams" Deck


Hover over cards for details, click for permalink
Deck import code : [Select]
7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dh 7di 7dj 7dk 7dl 7dm 7dn 7do 7dp 7dq 7dr 7ds 7e4 808 808 808 808 808 808 809 80a 80b 80c 80d 80e 80f 80g 80h 80i 80s 8pu




Huh?

I set out to make a deck with the lowest possible odds for an opponent to win a spin when you lose to them.



Criteria For the Deck:

  • With a minimum deck size of 30, the deck had to use 2 different elements.
  • Each card could only be included once.
  • Every card of each element must be included.


Fire & Aether?

  • After looking at all the elements, Fire and Aether seemed to be the most self-sufficient elements out of the bunch.
  • Except for the Lava Destroyer, no other element is required to activate an ability.
  • Every single Fire & Aether card is strong in its own right.
  • Fire & Aether has a little bit of everything with a strong base of creatures.
Except for maybe Death and Gravity, the same can't be said of the other elements.  (And besides, the themes and colors of "Fire" and "Aether" represent "the streams" the best.)  Conveniently, I've been was looking at these two elements for this deck for the past 2 days.  The Phoenix and Fractal were just released on the trainer and they just happen to fit the deck perfectly.

Note:  Ball Lightning works well with both Cremation and Fractal.









This deck doesn't have a high win percentage, but I've taken down a couple Top 50s.

And besides... no one is going to win anything off your loss anyway.


Discuss.

 ^-^
« Last Edit: June 12, 2012, 06:58:13 am by willng3 »

icybraker

  • Guest
Re: MrSexington's "Don't Cross the Streams" Deck https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=3942.msg38290#msg38290
« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2010, 08:25:33 pm »
Lol, you like creating evil decks that bug your opponent to no end. :) Lovely deck idea, too. May not work the best, but hey, if you can't win, neither can the opponent. }:)

Re: MrSexington's "Don't Cross the Streams" Deck https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=3942.msg38305#msg38305
« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2010, 08:43:43 pm »
With two Nymphs, there is a good somewhat better chance that the opponent will win a Relic, lol.

MrSexington

  • Guest
Re: MrSexington's "Don't Cross the Streams" Deck https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=3942.msg38309#msg38309
« Reply #3 on: March 14, 2010, 08:46:56 pm »
With two Nymphs, there is a good somewhat better chance that the opponent will win a Relic, lol.
Damnit.  You're right.

Maybe it should be half pillars, half towers too.

Hm...

 :-\

darkfrogger

  • Guest
Re: MrSexington's "Don't Cross the Streams" Deck https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=3942.msg43418#msg43418
« Reply #4 on: March 25, 2010, 12:19:10 am »
After seeing this deck and your rage quit deck, I have become convinced that MrSexington is evil.

 

blarg: