Grey dolls

[omegareaper7]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

534 534 534 534 534 534 710 710 710 710 710 710 710 710 710 710 710 71a 71b 71b 72i 72i 72i 7t9 7tb 7tg 7tg 7tg 7th 7th 8pt

While the idea isn't exactly new, i think the deck sorta is. Didn't see much with grey nymphs when i searched.  Figured i would post a deck that i have had for a long while.
Deck is capable of getting 6 turn wins while being able to control the board a little. Dolls are a nice form of poison with the nymph, and are a great nightmare target. Borderline useless for a lot of decks after all. 
The deck may not be practical for most, seeing as it does have 6 nymphs. But for the few that do, it may be a nice change of pace. And for the people who don't, it is possible to change out for parasites and do some balancing, but the deck isn't the same or as durable like that.

[Rutarete]

I don't think bone walls are the best defence option for this deck. The voodoos take a while to die, and then only grant you 2 bones per. (Why are there bones in a doll anyway?) I'd prefer using dusks.

Edit: if you switched nightmares for drain life then I'd be fine with it.

[Drake_XIV]

I don't think bone walls are the best defence option for this deck. The voodoos take a while to die, and then only grant you 2 bones per. (Why are there bones in a doll anyway?) I'd prefer using dusks.

> Implies you can only Afla on your Dolls.

[Rutarete]

I don't think bone walls are the best defence option for this deck. The voodoos take a while to die, and then only grant you 2 bones per. (Why are there bones in a doll anyway?) I'd prefer using dusks.

> Implies you can only Afla on your Dolls.

Why would you Alfa the opponent so that their cells can beat you down?

[Drake_XIV]

Well, then shove a Plague in there for Cells or something...

[omegareaper7]

I don't think bone walls are the best defence option for this deck. The voodoos take a while to die, and then only grant you 2 bones per. (Why are there bones in a doll anyway?) I'd prefer using dusks.

> Implies you can only Afla on your Dolls.

Why would you Alfa the opponent so that their cells can beat you down?

You poison until they die, then poison the cell. They lose a strong creature and don't get the cell. Maybe not the best of defense, but it works. And afla'd dolls can also be offense if need be, or a defense by getting rid of your own cells to bump up bonewalls.

[Vineroz]

Bonewall actually is the reason why aflatoxin need to be used multiple times.

As for the deck, I don't really like 2 different weapons in a deck, especially 1 of each. Maybe -1 Arsenic +1 Bonewall, because you will need more than 1 bonewall to keep you alive.

[Toimu13]

Spoiler for Hidden:

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

52g 534 534 534 534 534 5v0 5v0 5v0 5v0 5v0 5v0 710 710 710 710 710 718 718 718 718 718 718 72i 72i 72i 72i 72i 7t8 7tb 8pt

I don't have all the cards upped, but I'm trying something like this.

[Tiltias]

No eclipse? Also I agree that vamp dagger is more useful in this deck than arsenic.

Also, possibly add more darkness quanta and dark nymphs for lobo and higher damage?

Malignant cells are still an ok nightmare target. Especially if the AI refuses to play cells. (I'm not sure if it does)

[whatifidogetcaught?]

Wouldn't you be better served with Skull Buckler? It's cheaper, and Malignant Cells can't punch through it.

[omegareaper7]

Wouldn't you be better served with Skull Buckler? It's cheaper, and Malignant Cells can't punch through it.

Skull buckler also doesn't provide as much defense. And cells usually don't happen until they are almost dead.

[UnderneathTheLens]

Looks fun! xD

I'll try it out.

Wouldn't you be better served with Skull Buckler? It's cheaper, and Malignant Cells can't punch through it.

I don't think there's enough time to lockdown the enemy anyway. This deck is pretty rush.