Golem Duo

[mservando]

This deck is composed of the Golems :and .I trie dthis deck in 10 matches out of ten matches this deck won 7of the 10 this is meant for AI3(Still).I might post a AI4 Grinder tomorrow . :)If you guys wanna try it this is the import code:

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

58o 58o 58o 58o 58o 58o 58o 58o 58o 58q 58q 58q 58q 58q 58q 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5fa 5fa 5fa 5fa 5fa 5fa 8po

Please tell me if this deck is already in the forum so I can take it down right away.

Okay thanks.

[ralouf]

Maybe you may think a little before spamming forum with bad decks.

As I think that if I post it like that some people won't be happy I'll develop :

You're using 18 pillars in a rush deck, that at least 6 too much. your deck is composed by 2 creature and.. nothing
You can't deal with CC, you don't have CC, you don't have PC, you have nothing against shield or against a stall while using some of the best elements to deal with it.

Also I've heard about pendulum to fix quanta and avoid using 18 pillars in a duo deck.

[mservando]

Maybe you may think a little before spamming forum with bad decks.

As I think that if I post it like that some people won't be happy I'll develop :

You're using 18 pillars in a rush deck, that at least 6 too much. your deck is composed by 2 creature and.. nothing
You can't deal with CC, you don't have CC, you don't have PC, you have nothing against shield or against a stall while using some of the best elements to deal with it.

Also I've heard about pendulum to fix quanta and avoid using 18 pillars in a duo deck.

I'll take your word for it.

[Totila]

Is it today the "bad deck day" maybe?  I agree with Ralouf

[UndeadSpider1990]

"Oh look a deck. I have nothing constructive to say, so I'm just going to flame, trollolololol."

Come on fellas don't be a bunch of stink-heads.

Here's what I think.

Its weakness are those of all pure-offense decks - it's pure offense! I would personally suggest removing at least one of each Golem, changing some pillars to pendulums (and reducing the number of them), and adding in some rage pots. Your Earth golems can take one straight away, or your Lava Golems eventually, and they are always a possible source of enemy creature control too. Here's what I slapped together.

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

58q 58q 58q 58q 58q 593 593 5fa 5fa 5fa 5fa 5fa 5fb 5fb 5fb 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 8pm

Haven't really tested it, but it seems okay.

[mega plini]

Add some deflags to!

[ralouf]

Yes you lack deflag and don't need that much pends.

Also I don't think my post wasn't contructive.

[Holokausti]

I can't wait to see the AI4 grinder. Funny decks (as in not very good while the creator might think so) at least.

[Opsinis]

Maybe you may think a little before spamming forum with bad decks.

Last person to do that (that I can remember) was Xenodicius, look at him now. Of course, the difference is the quality of decks.
Xenocidius = good
mservando = in need

[Chapuz]

Maybe you may think a little before spamming forum with bad decks.

what are you saying? Everyone loves decks with 12 creatures and 9 pilars of each element!

@mservando: Another deck in which I have to suggest you: S I N E R G I Z E

[Dm]

You can't deal with CC, you don't have CC, you don't have PC, you have nothing against shield or against a stall while using some of the best elements to deal with it.

Well damn, rush decks changed a lot since the last time I saw one of them, apparently...

[furballdn]

Maybe you may think a little before spamming forum with bad decks.

what are you saying? Everyone loves decks with 12 creatures and 9 pilars of each element!

@mservando: Another deck in which I have to suggest you: S Y N E R G I Z E

I know right? At least there's some tiny synergy between the and lava golems though.