*Author

Lionheart

  • Guest
Anti-Quanta https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11575.msg142232#msg142232
« on: August 19, 2010, 10:58:18 pm »
Afta ma last post on tha "Deck help"-Forum i guess, i finally found a real good balance.
Already tried it on PvP and it works VERY WELL ^^

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink
Deck import code : [Select]
5uk 5uk 5ul 5um 5um 5um 5um 5um 5um 5up 5us 5us 5us 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 622 622 622 622 622 8pt



Here it iz... No need fo explainin' ya'mean  8)


But amma thankful fo erry advise / impression!
So, letz talk 'bout it...

SG ~ Pls work out tha Math  :D


Holla at Me
« Last Edit: June 11, 2012, 03:52:40 am by willng3 »

wavedash

  • Guest
Re: Anti-Quanta https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11575.msg142307#msg142307
« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2010, 01:41:11 am »
I stopped reading at "afta".

hklown

  • Guest
Re: Anti-Quanta https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11575.msg142326#msg142326
« Reply #2 on: August 20, 2010, 02:21:47 am »
First off, speak english. Seriously.

Secondly, one steal is kind of eh- you probably want to have more in the deck. Also, I'd replace the one obsidian dragon with an upped vampire. Yeah, it's less damage, but if you drop it and fractal the same turn, it's a lot of healing.

Also, you may want to work in some nightfall/eclipses- the damage adds up, even if it's just devourers.

midg3333

  • Guest
Re: Anti-Quanta https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11575.msg142456#msg142456
« Reply #3 on: August 20, 2010, 09:13:41 am »
2 obsidian pillars doesn't seem like enough... You are unlikely to draw them early on and if you draw them later in the game they are near-useless.

Offline Qwandri

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 449
  • Country: us
  • Reputation Power: 5
  • Qwandri is a Spark waiting for a buff.
Re: Anti-Quanta https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11575.msg142687#msg142687
« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2010, 05:59:49 pm »
2 obsidian pillars doesn't seem like enough... You are unlikely to draw them early on and if you draw them later in the game they are near-useless.
*devourer*
also, lionheart, it would be useful for you to type in a way people could understand.
Strike that, reverse it.

Ifailgood

  • Guest
Re: Anti-Quanta https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11575.msg142884#msg142884
« Reply #5 on: August 20, 2010, 10:09:39 pm »
Too many Aether quantas will go to waste...

Lionheart

  • Guest
Re: Anti-Quanta https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11575.msg144018#msg144018
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2010, 01:53:50 pm »
Too many Aether quantas will go to waste...
I need 2 Fractalize my Devourers in the 2nd or 3rd Round... Otherwise, the opponent will bring out 2 many Monsters/ Permanents.
Therefo i need 2 use Fractal ASAP! Once i get Control ( Opponent starts every Round wit 0 Quanta) i dont care 'bout my Aether Quanta anymore... from this point, all i need 2 do, is 2 wait fo my Dragon and Fractalize it ^^

See?

Ifailgood

  • Guest
Re: Anti-Quanta https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11575.msg144314#msg144314
« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2010, 08:37:14 pm »
But you won't be able to play all the devourer since at best, you will only have played 3 devourers by turn 2 and you won't have enough quanta, and your hand might be clogged by fractal and you won't get as many devourers.

Lionheart

  • Guest
Re: Anti-Quanta https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11575.msg144766#msg144766
« Reply #8 on: August 23, 2010, 11:54:11 am »
I've talked 2 alotta ppl, read tha QI and did some modifications...
Now look at this 'n' tell me whatcha think ?

Code: [Select]
5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5ul 5um 5um 5um 5um 5um 5um 5up 5us 5us 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 622 622 622 622
Feel's like im much faster now >.>"

Still, not even semi-ultimate  ::)

Offline manaboy100

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 417
  • Country: id
  • Reputation Power: 5
  • manaboy100 is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • *staaaaaaaaaare*
Re: Anti-Quanta https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11575.msg144837#msg144837
« Reply #9 on: August 23, 2010, 02:30:35 pm »
LOL, another farctal devourer deck, but I appreciate your work :)

Change mark to aether, change some aether pillar for vampires and dragons and nightfall and steal ^.^
*staaaaaaaaaare*

Lionheart

  • Guest
Re: Anti-Quanta https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11575.msg146341#msg146341
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2010, 06:06:54 pm »
Change mark to aether, change some aether pillar for vampires and dragons and nightfall and steal ^.^
aight thx. BUT:

Why more than 1 Dragon? That would only raise tha chance of drawin' em too early (instead of a useful devourer etc).
If i manage 2 "anti-quantize(? ^^)" before he brings out hard hitters (even if he did, i could DL them 2 death) - then all i need 2 do is 2 wait for my dragon + Fractal. I dont mind waitin 10 Rounds instead of 5 ;] In case i'll draw tha Dragon at last card turn, i (hopefully) got a DL in Hand, which will do like 50 dmg.
Almost tha same wit Vampires+Nightfalls: vamps can be blocked or killed so easily... instead of havin em (ok,ok- hp-drain is aight) i rather focus on bringin out devourer/Fractal ASAP. Again ~ if my opponent cant harm me, why should i use something that heals? ^^
U feel me?

I guess Nightfall isnt useful at all. It could kill my devourers, cuz' of fireshields/thorncarps etc. --- for only 1 dmg add? no thanks! Plus: My Dragons will do more dmg than i need  ;D

I juz' care 'bout anti-Quantize ASAP, ASAP, ASAP!


guolin

  • Guest
Re: Anti-Quanta https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11575.msg146430#msg146430
« Reply #11 on: August 25, 2010, 08:36:47 pm »
Change mark to aether, change some aether pillar for vampires and dragons and nightfall and steal ^.^
aight thx. BUT:

Why more than 1 Dragon? That would only raise tha chance of drawin' em too early (instead of a useful devourer etc).
If i manage 2 "anti-quantize(? ^^)" before he brings out hard hitters (even if he did, i could DL them 2 death) - then all i need 2 do is 2 wait for my dragon + Fractal. I dont mind waitin 10 Rounds instead of 5 ;] In case i'll draw tha Dragon at last card turn, i (hopefully) got a DL in Hand, which will do like 50 dmg.
Almost tha same wit Vampires+Nightfalls: vamps can be blocked or killed so easily... instead of havin em (ok,ok- hp-drain is aight) i rather focus on bringin out devourer/Fractal ASAP. Again ~ if my opponent cant harm me, why should i use something that heals? ^^
U feel me?

I guess Nightfall isnt useful at all. It could kill my devourers, cuz' of fireshields/thorncarps etc. --- for only 1 dmg add? no thanks! Plus: My Dragons will do more dmg than i need  ;D

I juz' care 'bout anti-Quantize ASAP, ASAP, ASAP!


Seriously, can you please speak proper English? Thanks.

Yeah, you might be able to lock the opponent's quanta pretty tightly. But that means nothing if you can't get damage going. Fractal Black Dragons is nice, but with only 1 in the deck, you may not draw it out in time.

Rainbows will easily get past your devourer lock and get very hard hitting creatures. Vampires will give you at least a chance against them. Also, what if you can't get a single Black Dragon in time, and your opponent has, say, a quinted Lava Destroyer eating at your health? Well, what if you had Eclipse? 10 Devourers would give you 10 damage, which is equal to a Black Dragon. 20 Devourers? 20 damage. It gets better with Nightfall, but it seems like you don't have upped cards. Facing a fire shield or Thorn Carapace? What the heck - just don't play your Eclipse!! Discard it, even, if you have the chance. Since you don't have any Earth quanta, one Plague or Rain of Fire, and all your itty bitty Devourers are gone anyways!

 

anything
blarg: