Rainbow Mark :o

[Time_lord_victorius]

an elemental made of emptyness? i can see that very easily. take a look at the art from the MTG card doom blade.

the big black scar there, thats void. it has not substance, but it cuts like steel. just like fire has no true substance, it burns anything it touches

[ZephyrPhantom]

an elemental made of emptyness? i can see that very easily. take a look at the art from the MTG card doom blade.

the big black scar there, thats void. it has not substance, but it cuts like steel. just like fire has no true substance, it burns anything it touches

You mean like this?

That's the Mark of the Void.

[OldTrees]

this puts us back at square 1.

what if we could... OMG, briliant idea!!!!! 2 extra elements! rainbow and... bloodshadow's pseudo element: void! this mark, void, however would work as a void pillar; it drains one quanta from the opponent!

this makes sorta sense in a way.

What if we could just use Other? Bloodshadow intends Void to be a subcategory of Other cards. Also void being a lack cannot be a type of element/elemental hence no Void mark either.

In pokemon tcg, there is a "double other" energy, although there really aren't enough other cards for this to happen, and then there would need to be an other quanta pile

Now that you have laughed at me for loving pokemon tcg,... Magic has a double other land also.

You misunderstand.
Other: 
Cards like Quantum Pillar and Shards.

[Time_lord_victorius]

an elemental made of emptyness? i can see that very easily. take a look at the art from the MTG card doom blade.

the big black scar there, thats void. it has not substance, but it cuts like steel. just like fire has no true substance, it burns anything it touches

You mean like this?

That's the Mark of the Void.

yes, that is void mark--------------------->destroys 1 quanta from opponent
and this  is rainbow mark------->makes 1 random quanta of any element

any question students? (who am i to say that, lol)

[Nepycros]

an elemental made of emptyness? i can see that very easily. take a look at the art from the MTG card doom blade.

the big black scar there, thats void. it has not substance, but it cuts like steel. just like fire has no true substance, it burns anything it touches

You mean like this?

That's the Mark of the Void.

yes, that is void mark--------------------->destroys 1 quanta from opponent
and this  is rainbow mark------->makes 1 random quanta of any element

any question students? (who am i to say that, lol)

Yes, one question. Why would I want 1 random quanta, when I could be guaranteed to get a quanta from a single element? It sounds silly to have any sort of a deck where it would be more beneficial to get one random element, rather than a single focused element that I can use to base strategies on.

[Time_lord_victorius]

well ask student, i see your point and i shall answer thee in the best i can.

if we would make it give 1 quanta of all elements, it's litteraly the "novamark". if we give it 3 random quanta of any elements (like quantum pillar/tower),
everyone would see it as too good to pass up and we'll all be (ab)using it.

i don't know if 2 random quanta could possibly work, but then again people will call it U-P because it does not entirely reflect the pillar/tower it represents.

any more questions?

[RootRanger]

if we give it 3 random quanta of any elements (like quantum pillar/tower), everyone would see it as too good to pass up and we'll all be using it.

No, not really.
Quantum pillars already generate three times as much as regular pillars, and some people still don't use them.
The reason there will not be a rainbow mark is because it doesn't fit with the flow of the game or something. Meh; I don't see a problem with it.

[Time_lord_victorius]

if we give it 3 random quanta of any elements (like quantum pillar/tower), everyone would see it as too good to pass up and we'll all be using it.

No, not really.
Quantum pillars already generate three times as much as regular pillars, and some people still don't use them.

true, but in a rainbow deck (because its the rainbow mark) it would be waay to abusive as a mark
2 random elements is a possibility

[RootRanger]

true, but in a rainbow deck (because its the rainbow mark) it would be waay to abusive

It might help rainbows based off of quantum pillars, but hurt rainbows centered on 1-2 elements (such as scrambled shriekers, which focuses on earth and entropy).

[QuantumT]

if we give it 3 random quanta of any elements (like quantum pillar/tower), everyone would see it as too good to pass up and we'll all be using it.

No, not really.
Quantum pillars already generate three times as much as regular pillars, and some people still don't use them.

true, but in a rainbow deck (because its the rainbow mark) it would be waay to abusive as a mark
2 random elements is a possibility

It wouldn't be too strong if it made 3. Very few rainbows would use it, as they usually either want an mark for their supernovae, or a mark for hourglasses.

[Time_lord_victorius]

this mark can make both

[ZephyrPhantom]

this mark can make both

From what I (and I believe some other people) interpret you're just saying for the rainbow mark to generate 2 random quantum. Why not 3 in that case to make it on par with a pillar?