Pseudoquanta

[Hyroen]

Loving Priori!! Love the name, the art is a little questionable however. How do you feel the symbol represents the past?

Nice idea Saynt. Kudos. May I ask that the small quanta symbol be made so it can be included?

[Saynt]

I'm not quite sure what the symbol represents, but isn't there a numerological meaning of the number 7 that fits?

[Essence]

Copy quanta needs to be redrawn using the Blank Mark as a starting point. 

[Hyroen]

nerd1 has been contacted by me regarding Copy Quanta.

[Essence]

Also, I'm working on some non-Other cards that use Apogee quanta, so could you remove the "Shown on "Other" cards" from the chart?

Thanks

[Hyroen]

Done. ^_^

Still waiting for nerd1's response.

Aside, just wanting to remind everyone, feel free to post inspiration or brainstorm here. Thank you.

[Essence]

CURATOR COMMENT:
I'd hate to be the bearer of bad news, but pseudoquanta/new element cards are not allowed to be moved into Crucible.

If you have any questions, you can PM one of the Curators. ^^;

Well, that just totally unnecessarily killed what could have been a great series of ideas.

[ZephyrPhantom]

CURATOR COMMENT:
I'd hate to be the bearer of bad news, but pseudoquanta/new element cards are not allowed to be moved into Crucible.

If you have any questions, you can PM one of the Curators. ^^;

Well, that just totally unnecessarily killed what could have been a great series of ideas.

It happened before to my Duality Series. I'm not too suprised, given Oldtrees's initial warning.

However, I wouldn't give up until I see coding proof that the quantum system would not be able to handle Pseudoquanta. (Perhaps check with Kael?) In the end, it's really up to Zanz, since we've had cases where low-level cards (Minotaur/GoTP) got moved up rather quickly on a slight inspiration by him. At some point there could be an additon to the current quantum code (perhaps in a v2.0 or something) - dual-cards and pseudoquantum might get the time to shine then.

Just my .

[Hyroen]

Yes, I should include that sad piece of news in the OP. Getting to that.

I've quite the strong opinion about the harsh opposition coming from the Curators.

The forum is a place of creativity and communication. It's where great minds can come up with great concepts. If the Crucible system was made, it was to see what the community liked, in an organized fashion. Thus far it has done this excellently.

Pseudoquanta, as we can all see, present no new type of element, do not have new card backgrounds, and fit in perfectly with the Crucible system. If you put them on an Other card, it goes against Other cards, if it makes it to challenge Permanents, it goes against Permanents. We're not making cards that are humorous, and in no way consider pseudoquanta a joke, or out of the realm of acceptable for the Crucible.

Shutting the doors on pseudoquanta is shutting the doors on opportunity, growth and creativity, an act I had not expected from the highly qualified Curators. Alas, as the ruling of bureaucracy remains in its place all we can do is grumble.

Grumble away my fellow lightbulbs, we have been shut off. ^_^

[nerd1]

i have a question, if a card using a psuedoquanta that simply represents another kind of real quanta (such as my copy quanta) where made, and zanzarino confirms that he could easily add that card (or at least the psuedoquanta part of it) to the game code, could it still be moved to crucible?

[OldTrees]

Grumble away my fellow lightbulbs, we have been shut off. ^_^

A permanent solution is being discussed.

[nerd1]

i see no reason as to why psuedoquanta cards can't be put in crucible, as all psuedoquanta is is normal quanta, but with some special effects, which could be written down, but would take a lot of space and time, so psuedoquanta is used as shorthand.
edit-also, i need someone to do the art for my copy quanta, as i am hopeless with online art thingies.