Pre-Smithy Ideas

[XYTWO]

I had an idea just a moment ago. It's meant as a semi-nilla for Earth.

Sodium Golem | Potassium Golem
5 Earth | 3 Earth
5/2 | 4/3
If this card is flooded (under effect of Flooding), destroy it and deal 10 damage to the opponent. (same upped/unupped)

It's a bit of a rough idea (and it probably needs changes due to Antlion), but what do you think of the idea? (The explosion damage should probably be boosted, BTW. Just saying.)

[ZephyrPhantom]

I had an idea just a moment ago. It's meant as a semi-nilla for Earth.

Sodium Golem | Potassium Golem
5 Earth | 3 Earth
5/2 | 4/3
If this card is flooded (under effect of Flooding), destroy it and deal 10 damage to the opponent. (same upped/unupped)

It's a bit of a rough idea (and it probably needs changes due to Antlion), but what do you think of the idea? (The explosion damage should probably be boosted, BTW. Just saying.)

Hey, you'd probably be interested in using ths the card designer challlenge for Flooding that's coming up soon.  This card should probably have explosion damage of 15 since it'd require 7 other creatures, which is at least a 3-element 3 card combo.

[Time_lord_victorius]

Oi, just me. i came up with litteraly a field nuking idea. i've seen a few cards that wipe out an entire reserve of quanta for the spell
E.G: nightmare, fractal.

why would fire not have one? here's my idea. a  card that costs 8 to play and consumes the rest of the quanta to destroy every single permanents in play without sparing those that are protected. just a whole sudden fosilisation of all permanents in play OR disableing those permanents for an amount of round equal to  quanta consumed/10. the max would be of course 8 turns. its one or the other for the idea. what you guys say?

[Nepycros]

Oi, just me. i came up with litteraly a field nuking idea. i've seen a few cards that wipe out an entire reserve of quanta for the spell
E.G: nightmare, fractal.

why would fire not have one? here's my idea. a  card that costs 8 to play and consumes the rest of the quanta to destroy every single permanents in play without sparing those that are protected. just a whole sudden fosilisation of all permanents in play OR disableing those permanents for an amount of round equal to  quanta consumed/10. the max would be of course 8 turns. its one or the other for the idea. what you guys say?

And this is good, how? It's essentially a game winning card. You'd destroy all of the opponent's pillars, meaning they'd generate no quanta. This isn't a problem for mono-fire because they have alternate quanta-generating methods.

[Time_lord_victorius]

now that a good member is backing me on this (i thought i'd get shut down). we could try to develop it.
lets  it up!

[ZephyrPhantom]

And this is good, how? It's essentially a game winning card. You'd destroy all of the opponent's pillars, meaning they'd generate no quanta. This isn't a problem for mono-fire because they have alternate quanta-generating methods.

now that a good member is backing me on this (i thought i'd get shut down). we could try to develop it.
lets  it up!

No offense, but I don't think Nepycros was backing you up.

Also I don't like this card either, especially since this and chaining silence completley locks your opponent down. It even bypasses protected permanents so there is no way to counter it unless you run quanta producing creatures or Nova.

[Time_lord_victorius]

this is pre-smithy here. no big deal, we can work this thing out.  alright. for 8 and draining rest... lockdown all permanents that are not protected for 2 turns +  quanta drained /20 (max being 3 extra turns). locking down in means that they do not produce or their effects are disabled. weapons are only partially affected: meaning that activated abilities cannot be used (same for passive) but can still inflict damage

[rohlfo]

Is there any room in the game for creatures in between normal and immaterial?
by that I mean a creature which is immune to status changes? so poison, freeze, lobo, delay etc.
can still be targeted by rain of fire, life drain, ice bolt, devour etc

thoughts? If liked I'll try come up with a critter

[Pineapple]

i was thinking of making a shield that inverts the attacking creatures' attacks (antimatter) and, if they do not possess an ability (word under square), give them the ability "venomous."

I have no clue which element it should be in, and I need a peer-check on originality. (I know EvaRia was doing a momentum shield some time ago..)

[XYTWO]

I have two ideas at the moment, and I'd like to see if they would be any good.

??? / ??? (perhaps Diversion?)
Permanent (upped+unupped)
7 / 6
All spells that target multiple creatures only effect the first target while this card is in play.
(A note: this is possibly for the Flooding competition) Basically, this card would provide a nerf and a smaller buff to mass CC spells. This would make the spell target the first creature it would hit (the first filled slot) and hit it with all of the damage that would normally be spread. This would have obvious consequences for RoF that could buff and nerf it (could kill one creature pretty harshly, but nerfs its normal purpose). However, this card would keep Flooding as it is now, thereby buffing it.


Return / Return
Spell
3 / 2
Target card in your hand gains a return counter. Cannot target a Return.
A return counter gives the card +1 quanta cost, but also allows it to remain in the hand when played (using up a return counter instead of the card). The +1 cost would leave with the return counter, stack for however many Returns, and be in the same element as the original cost. 

[Time_lord_victorius]

well, i came up with a new idea that i was actually able to put into cards.
here goes




i tried to submit it but i saw that i had no affinity with the table structure of HTML (witch craft!!!)

i'd like some comments please

[Nepycros]

Way UP. Make both of them have a cost of 2, tops.