Hasten Quantum l Fast Forward

[Christopaz]

Sorry for bad name idea.
SPELL CARD (I think making it permanent will make it OP)
Hasten Quantum:
Costs X-4  quanta
Doubles quanta production the next turn. X is the number of pillars you have

Fast Forward:
Costs X-5  quanta
Double quanta production the next turn. X is the number of pillars you have

NOTE: you get the quanta production during the turn you played the card and the quanta production is not permanent
Suggestions? Probably more cost of  quanta....
I NEED FEEDBACK!!! lol
(I am to shy to make a card design and ask for an artist to make the card art........ SHOULD I?)

[Brahma]

There's no need to be shy, there are plenty of artists around the forum willing to make you some custom art.

On the other hand, this card definitely needs a higher cost. Imagine if you have 9 pillars/pendulums on the field, that makes for 18 the next turn by spending a measly 4 quanta D:

[EmeraldTiger]

Here is my thought on this:
It Provides a quanta burst then no quanta for 1 turn each.

[Christopaz]

Here is my thought on this:
It Provides a quanta burst then no quanta for 1 turn each.

What do you mean by quanta burst? you mean like from the immolation and nova?

Yeah it may seem to be right if there will be no quanta production the next round after the spell functioned

[artimies7]

Balancing Idea: Three fold the production, then destroy half the stack.

Yah? Nay?

[OldTrees]

Balancing Idea: Three fold the production, then destroy half the stack.

Yah? Nay?

Nay.


Gain 1 quanta per pillar/tower. Cost: expected return - 4|6
If you expect this to normally be played when there are 8 pillars then have this cost 4 |2 (8-4|8-6)

[Christopaz]

Balancing Idea: Three fold the production, then destroy half the stack.

Yah? Nay?

Nay.


Gain 1 quanta per pillar/tower. Cost: expected return - 4|6
If you expect this to normally be played when there are 8 pillars then have this cost 4 |2 (8-4|8-6)

Would that make it kinda OP?

[OldTrees]

Balancing Idea: Three fold the production, then destroy half the stack.

Yah? Nay?

Nay.


Gain 1 quanta per pillar/tower. Cost: expected return - 4|6
If you expect this to normally be played when there are 8 pillars then have this cost 4 |2 (8-4|8-6)

Would that make it kinda OP?

Notice I did not suggest having it cost 4 |2 .
I suggested it cost (X-4) |(X-6) where X is the expected number of pillars.
Is 4 |6 per card OP? Probably not compared to Immolation.

[Christopaz]

Balancing Idea: Three fold the production, then destroy half the stack.

Yah? Nay?

Nay.


Gain 1 quanta per pillar/tower. Cost: expected return - 4|6
If you expect this to normally be played when there are 8 pillars then have this cost 4 |2 (8-4|8-6)

Would that make it kinda OP?

Notice I did not suggest having it cost 4 |2 .
I suggested it cost (X-4) |(X-6) where X is the expected number of pillars.
Is 4 |6 per card OP? Probably not compared to Immolation.

Good idea. . . . . . .

[Pineapple]

Please make a thread in "Card Ideas and Art" using the table code from http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,5039.0.html
(Card Image Builder is http://helltgivre.free.fr/elements/card_beta)

[Christopaz]

Please make a thread in "Card Ideas and Art" using the table code from http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,5039.0.html
(Card Image Builder is http://helltgivre.free.fr/elements/card_beta)

But I still don't have art..
You like it tho?

[Vipy5]

Even if you don't have art, still make it. It makes reading the card so much easier (so does table).
I thinks it's a good idea, though I have no idea how to make it fair, if you have 0-6 towers (for upped vers), then this card is free. I suggest having a base minimum cost (somehow  ).