I would like to give everyone a job on this team. If there are any jobs that are needed but not listed feel free to make a suggestion. Our main mission is to come up with new a exciting ideas together. I want our secondary mission to make card curators job easier. I want our third mission to be figuring why ideas fail. I have my ideas of who should do what job, but I will leave that up for discussion.
Leader 1 position
Co-Leader 1 position
Analytics 4 positions
Critical eyes 3 positions
Art 4 positions
Idea Promoters 4 positions
Adding more structure to the card creation is a good idea. I like the idea of people assigned to creating art for the ideas. I would also recommend that the leaders also be responsible for at least 1 other role.
Making the curators' jobs easier is a good idea if done right. We need to be careful that our numbers do not make us become the authors of other people's cards.
I do not know if trying a large scale figuring out why ideas fail is wise. The current trial Exploding Pot|Exploding Cauldron has only seen reviews from 2 people and those reviews were not satisfactory to explain why it was archived. I may be proved wrong soon but I think best we will be able to pull of would be analyzing our communal card series that fail and the criticisms in the threads looking for patterns.
However I would recommend that people feel free to act as roles they did not sign up to be. The roles would (in my suggestion) just be there as responsibilities that we can count on being preformed (assuming something abnormal doesn't come up in real life).
If I understand correctly: Analytics is in charge of advice on balancing, Critical Eye is in charge of thematical resonance.
I would also recommend Analytics be changed to Balancing. Not all balancing is formulaic like my method. Uppercut is great at balancing and completely disagrees with my theory. I consider him my equal if not my better when it comes to balancing. Additionally his reasoned intuition method is more effective at balancing new effects then my dissection formula method.
I think for leader and co-leader we will need at least 2 nominations for a candidate and nominated individuals cannot return a nomination to the sender. (Obviously I would nominate myself but no one should be allowed to nominate themselves)
I nominate Emerald Tiger and Uppercut if they are willing as candidates.
I think for the other roles people should sign up and be willing but not required to act as the other roles from time to time.
