Which NON-Rainbow FG deck?

[yaladilae]

Well I made poison quartet more for fun then heavy grinding, agree it is slow, but it is really fun
1 tip: 2 eternity to halt the FG while you draw thru your deck for a buildup
(Will post long guide on my thread later)

Also, since you are testing non-rainbow
Dont forget Essence's 2rare 2up > Ofc you should test it with a few SoG added and all upped if you wish so.

[Artois]

Also, since you are testing non-rainbow
Dont forget Essence's 2rare 2up > Ofc you should test it with a few SoG added and all upped if you wish so.

Essence's 2rare 2up
OK, post up an upped version that you recommend and I will use that version.

[yaladilae]

Also, since you are testing non-rainbow
Dont forget Essence's 2rare 2up > Ofc you should test it with a few SoG added and all upped if you wish so.

Essence's 2rare 2up
OK, post up an upped version that you recommend and I will use that version.

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,5656.0.html
Scroll down, but ask Essence what he think since its his deck

Oh, why is terro's name on the title but mine isnt *sobs*

[Artois]

Also, since you are testing non-rainbow
Dont forget Essence's 2rare 2up > Ofc you should test it with a few SoG added and all upped if you wish so.

Essence's 2rare 2up
OK, post up an upped version that you recommend and I will use that version.

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,5656.0.html
Scroll down, but ask Essence what he think since its his deck

Oh, why is terro's name on the title but mine isnt *sobs*

Because your name is TOO long for the format!

However, you do get a nice write up underneath, don't you think?

[yaladilae]

Because your name is TOO long for the format!

However, you do get a nice write up underneath, don't you think?

Putting numbers feels like you are ranking it (I will stop being picky)

But yay, nice write up

I added some strat on my thread for my deck hehe

[steve57man]

probably the biggest problem with FG is that it isn't much fun...once you play about a hundred games with the same deck it makes you want to never play the game again, especially since the games take so long.
different decks (nymphomania, etc.) may have lower win percentages but they sure are more interesting.

[twinsbuster]

I will suggest the fire lance + phase shield deck

Code: [Select]

4vj 5lg 5rp 6rn 6rn 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dk 7dk 7dk 7dk 7dk 7dk 7dn 808 808 808 808 80d 80d 80d 80d 80d 80d

[NecroDragon]

Useful 

[Artois]

...different decks (nymphomania, etc.) may have lower win percentages but they sure are more interesting.

I gotta agree with you about Nyphomania, whichever version, they are soo much fun!!

[Getawu2]

Nice Overview - though I think there are better builds for Rol/Hope with higher win rates.

I often play other decks, but recorded about 75 games with Rol/Hope now (48 games 1.21 (http://elementsstatistics.comxa.com/getstatistics.php?dv=899459041), rest 1.22 (http://elementsstatistics.comxa.com/getstatistics.php?dv=2895509083)) and got 40 - 33 wins atm (23 EM), 55 % win rate.

[xdude]

Nice Overview - though I think there are better builds for Rol/Hope with higher win rates.

I often play other decks, but recorded about 75 games with Rol/Hope now (48 games 1.21 (http://elementsstatistics.comxa.com/getstatistics.php?dv=899459041), rest 1.22 (http://elementsstatistics.comxa.com/getstatistics.php?dv=2895509083)) and got 40 - 33 wins atm (23 EM), 55 % win rate.

I think that specific Hope/RoL deck is made for speed, not for a big win percent. The ones with bigger win percentages are often slower and yield less electrum / hour (but more score).

[Artois]

Nice Overview - though I think there are better builds for Rol/Hope with higher win rates.

I often play other decks, but recorded about 75 games with Rol/Hope now (48 games 1.21 (http://elementsstatistics.comxa.com/getstatistics.php?dv=899459041), rest 1.22 (http://elementsstatistics.comxa.com/getstatistics.php?dv=2895509083)) and got 40 - 33 wins atm (23 EM), 55 % win rate.

I think that specific Hope/RoL deck is made for speed, not for a big win percent. The ones with bigger win percentages are often slower and yield less electrum / hour (but more score).

I tried other RoL/Hope decks and didn't like them, however upon reading the original thread, the concensus was that a deck built on Seravy's build was a good starting point.  I agree.  I found this deck to be very fast, very fun, and utilsed the basics of RoL/Hope without getting bogged down with extra cards.

I am sure there are other versions out there, but it would be impossible to list & test them all... well in this lifetime anyway!

Meanwhile, I'm getting bogged down with the Poison Quartet, 30% winrate (so far), but it takes sooo long to play.... I'll have the test results up, sometime next year!