help name, explosions/air/lighting Trio. and earth/light Duo

[Crowbarofjustice]

by crowbarofjustice

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5f6 5f6 5f6 5f6 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5of 5of 5of 5of 5of 5of 5ol 5ol 5om 5om 5om 5om 5om 5om 5on 5on 5on 5on 5on 5on 5oo 5oo 5oo 5oo 5oo 61q 61q 61q 61q 61q 61q 63a 63a 63a 63a 63a 63a 8pr

the deck already works very well for PVP1 (may not work for your standards but its good enough for me)

i just need a clever name for it
but i can't, for the life of me, think of one!

it has to be something explosive-y with the deflags gases shockwaves and lightning it would be ridiculous not to make it chaos themed.

i have another deck i need help naming

by crowbarofjustice

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

58q 58q 58q 58q 58q 58q 58r 58r 592 592 592 592 593 593 593 5ld 5ld 5ld 5le 5le 5le 5li 5li 5li 5lj 5lj 5lj 5lk 5lk 5lm 5lm 5lm 5lm 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 8pm

this deck is still young and may still have many kinks
but i will work those out personally
i just need a snappy name.

please help!

[furballdn]

BOOM SHAKA LACKA!

Although trios are pretty hard to balance. I'd suggest running lightnings or deflags off your mark. Then using fire pillars to produce the needed for deflags and the cards. Also, that's quite a fat deck.

[Crowbarofjustice]

BOOM SHAKA LACKA!

Although trios are pretty hard to balance. I'd suggest running lightnings or deflags off your mark. Then using fire pillars to produce the needed for deflags and the cards. Also, that's quite a fat deck.

the fire pends are for deflags and gasses, i do not need much of it nor do i need it right away,
the aether pends are only in there for the lighting, it may seem like a bad idea but to get a total of 12 CC cards packed in here to stall it is worth it, i also do not need those right away since i can use shockwaves until i get enough aether to use lightings.

quanta is absolutely no problem in this deck since i can stall for awhile before getting the gases and dragons
i can also use leftover CC cards to attack enemy directly if it becomes a close fight.

[furballdn]

Well I'm very sure the deck is far from optimal, but if you're fine with it and just want a name, fine.

Holy stone fortress for the second one? (Why guardian angels? They are literally useless!)

[mwaetht]

With that much CC and some PC, plus the Wings, you could win by deckout or wait to play 5 Unstable Gases (or theoretically 4 UG, 4 Lghtning...) in one turn for OTK. Do you need the Azure Dragons? Also, if you're going to run Aether and Wings, you could include Phase Spiders. Of course, the downside is that the point of the deck is to kill the opponent's creatures with hard CC, so Spiders may not be useful...

If you want a more damage-oriented deck as opposed to a deckout/stall for OTK, you could trim the deck down to fewer cards. You currently have 14 CC cards (Shockwaves, Lightnings, OEs, not counting UGs because almost nobody uses them for CC) in 52 cards (27% of the deck). Also, you have 4 Deflag in 52 cards, which is 7.7% of the deck.

If you cut out the Aether bit and trimmed down to 30 cards, you could have 8 CC (Shockwaves and OE) in 30 cards, which is also 27% of the deck. However, you could keep your Deflags for 4 PC cards out of 30, or 13%. By trimming it down, you retain almost all your potential CC powers (less than 1% difference), increase the likelihood of getting PC, and increase your deck's consistency by having a smaller deck and fewer elements.

Name: Distant Star? Cosmos? Flash? Firestarter? (just brainstorming)

Name for second deck: Fortitude? Radiance? Sanctify? Awakening?

[Crowbarofjustice]

@ mwaetht
thanks for the idea friend, taking out the dragons and going for a stall deck does seem like a very good idea since not many people pack more than 12 flying creatures and since flying creatures don't often have high HP. (unless it is    dragon, but most of those are not common in PVP1)

[Kakerlake]

I usually name the decks after what's in it.
So your first deck would be something like "Azure Gassy PCC trio" - or without the Dragons: "Gassy PCC trio"

But as a Deckout deck with winning option, it is much too big for my taste. First off, I'd remove the part. Your deck doesn't lack CC at all, so having those only gives RNG the option to screw your hand and decreases the winning chance quite a bit.
Also, Removing the dragons seems like a good idea, I'd keep 2 or 3 though, just because I like dragons, now it's possible to swap to a fire mark and adapt the pillars.
Now, it'd be a duo and the name would change to "Azure Gassy PCC duo".

by Kakerlake

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5f6 5f6 5f6 5f6 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5of 5of 5ol 5ol 5om 5om 5om 5om 5om 5om 5on 5on 5on 5on 5on 5on 5oo 5oo 5oo 5oo 5oo 5pu 5pu 5pu 5pu 5pu 5pu 8po

I'm still not happy with this deck and would probably cut it down to 35-ish cards, but since you like tose fatty decks, guess you could try this one.

This name is a bit harder, as it has more versatile stuff in it.
Random thoughts are:
"Golems with RoL disorder"
"Golems of Hope"
"The Miracle of light Golems"
"Safehouse"

Have fun working on your deck

[Chapuz]

First deck: All the  stuff can disappear, and would work better if the  production comes from immo fireflies or mark only.

Second deck: Too many cards for only 6 golems and 2 dragons to cast a Luci+Hope. Too few hopes. Useless solar shield.