Fire/Entropy

[kyle1234513]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vd 4vn 4vn 4vn 6u2 6u7 6u7 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7di 7di 7dm 7dm 7dn 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ee 7ee 7ee 7f2 7f2 8pj

so im working on this deck. the theory is entropy support. im looking to antimatter a few of his large cards to just sustain myself. I also plan on adding a fire shield or two and replace the Fahrenheits once i upgrade my shield. so that would take care of numerous weaker cards. any thoughts on how to balance the quanta issue and deck number? Id also like to add more chaos powers as well to increase my dragons survival rate.

[Ginyu]

In a duo, you are always better using pendulums instead of two types of pillars. Additionally, I'm not sure if SoB is useful here, since you don't have Fire Mark and so - due to the fact they are exceeding the 30-card-limit - you draw only one card each.

[Higurashi]

Hm, strange mix between a rush and a stall. Your rush part won't be very fast most of the time and the dragons die easily against CC, so you can't break a stall like this. I'd say focus more on the stall part, remove Cremations, Dragons, SoBe and potentially the MP's too. Fire Buckler isn't bad, nor are Firestorms. Add another Fahren or two and 6 Fire Lances for:

• Tons of CC
• Burst damage against stalls (can OTK)
• Spell damage gives you two ways to do damage; much harder to shut down

Adjust quanta accordingly (I'd suggest Burning Towers and the rest fire pends with Entropy mark). With the CP gone you can pack another AM. Demon or Purple Nymph are optional since they'll likely die.

If you want to keep the focus on physical damage, I'd still remove Cremations for more reliable quanta production and for saving some card space. MP's are good since they don't die, but after that I'd still focus on Lances for the aforementioned reasons.

[kyle1234513]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4vc 4vc 4vd 4vd 4vn 4vn 4vn 6u7 6u7 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dk 7dk 7dk 7dk 7dk 7dk 7dl 7dm 7dm 7dn 7dn 7do 7do 7do 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 7e4 7f2 7f2 7f2 8pj

so this is what i made with the changes. i have excess fire pillars/pends. just looking to see how many more to add and what else to potentially take out. i definitely see myself getting a 7draw with no pillars with this one.

[andretimpa]

12/40 pillars is actually quite low. You'll surely never go beyond 3 in your starting hand, with a lot of 1 pillar draws.