*Author

abysswalker

  • Guest
SUPER DECK OF AWESOMENESS AND COOLNESS https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6738.msg72029#msg72029
« on: May 20, 2010, 10:32:31 pm »
It's pretty awesome. It's pretty cool. It's super.

This deck is still in beta stage. I need help with the development, and thought I'd open it to the community for further testing.



Code: [Select]
6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6ug 71b 71b 71b 744 744 744 74b 74b 74b 74b 77d 77d 7k2 7n3 7q5 7q5 7q8 80h 80h 80h
EDIT: Changed up the ratios, and decided not to go with a PA. Feel free to take one if you want.
EDIT: Minor changes. Took a PA, added an hourglass, took out the shards.
EDIT: Changed...again. This version seems to work a lot better :)
EDIT:Added grav towers, took out a few quantum towers

Note the entropy nymph. If you don't have one, replace it with a butterfly effect (credits to Terroking for this idea)

Offline yaladilae

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 951
  • Reputation Power: 12
  • yaladilae is taking their first peeks out of the Antlion's burrow.yaladilae is taking their first peeks out of the Antlion's burrow.
  • † RIP Butterfly Angel †
  • Awards: Undefeated 100-0 Competition Winner
Re: SUPER DECK OF AWESOMENESS AND COOLNESS https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6738.msg72052#msg72052
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2010, 10:58:55 pm »
[22:56:45] abysswalker: yala!
[22:56:49] abysswalker: right a post for me!

Offline Demagog

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2557
  • Reputation Power: 40
  • Demagog soars like the Phoenix, unable to be repressed.Demagog soars like the Phoenix, unable to be repressed.Demagog soars like the Phoenix, unable to be repressed.Demagog soars like the Phoenix, unable to be repressed.Demagog soars like the Phoenix, unable to be repressed.Demagog soars like the Phoenix, unable to be repressed.Demagog soars like the Phoenix, unable to be repressed.Demagog soars like the Phoenix, unable to be repressed.
  • New to Elements
Re: SUPER DECK OF AWESOMENESS AND COOLNESS https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6738.msg72057#msg72057
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2010, 11:07:27 pm »
No need to spam, Yaladilae.

I'd say remove a bonewall and the armors, then add another SoG and two PA's. That way you won't pretty much auto-lose against anyone with permanent control. Practically all of your damage is coming from a queen, so if that queen is at the bottom of your deck, you'll have a hard time dealing enough damage. You might take a growth creature to counteract that, or a boneyard and replace the queen with an elf.

abysswalker

  • Guest
Re: SUPER DECK OF AWESOMENESS AND COOLNESS https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6738.msg72075#msg72075
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2010, 11:36:03 pm »
Dema, the heavy armors are sort of what's keeping this deck afloat. If I didn't have it, it would pretty much be a loss against any false god with high atk creatures, like obliterator. If my FFQ is at the bottom of my deck, I wait till I get it, then use an eternity. You might be right about the PA, though, it could help a  lot. Bone wall is NEEDED, and is a great combo with otys.

sSethia

  • Guest
Re: SUPER DECK OF AWESOMENESS AND COOLNESS https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6738.msg72170#msg72170
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2010, 04:06:12 am »
Bone wall is NEEDED, and is a great combo with otys.
Three bonewalls are NOT NEEDED.

Offline yaladilae

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 951
  • Reputation Power: 12
  • yaladilae is taking their first peeks out of the Antlion's burrow.yaladilae is taking their first peeks out of the Antlion's burrow.
  • † RIP Butterfly Angel †
  • Awards: Undefeated 100-0 Competition Winner
Re: SUPER DECK OF AWESOMENESS AND COOLNESS https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6738.msg72524#msg72524
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2010, 07:12:15 pm »
FYI, I wasnt spamming, I was thinking about the deck while abyss wanted me to write something

Not much to analyse, but 2 points thats not mentioned, for you to consider

- Rain of fire instead of heavy armor
- 2 Bonewall, 1 fog shield (much quicker to get out for safety)

Offline plastiqe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1749
  • Country: ca
  • Reputation Power: 0
  • plastiqe hides under a Cloak.
Re: SUPER DECK OF AWESOMENESS AND COOLNESS https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6738.msg72548#msg72548
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2010, 07:38:25 pm »
I FEEL COOLER AND AWESOMER JUST FOR READING THIS THREAD!

abysswalker

  • Guest
Re: SUPER DECK OF AWESOMENESS AND COOLNESS https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6738.msg72637#msg72637
« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2010, 09:30:44 pm »
IMO three bonwalls ARE needed. I think a big reason why most fg decks these days have ~30% win rates is the lack of shields. SoGs only so far. Heavy armors really help in this deck; its basically why this deck doesn't totally suck. Imagine how long it would take to get an oty to the required hp to take down one of obliterator's dragons. Very hard.
I'm not sure about the fire storm. You COULD take it, but with the otys, it's really only gonna help against super swarm decks, like ferox's

Lluis83

  • Guest
Re: SUPER DECK OF AWESOMENESS AND COOLNESS https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6738.msg72721#msg72721
« Reply #8 on: May 22, 2010, 12:26:19 am »



What % more or less have this deck against FG?

abysswalker

  • Guest
Re: SUPER DECK OF AWESOMENESS AND COOLNESS https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6738.msg72758#msg72758
« Reply #9 on: May 22, 2010, 01:58:43 am »

What % more or less have this deck against FG?
I'm not sure...it's why I listed this deck as still in beta stages

killfer8

  • Guest
Re: SUPER DECK OF AWESOMENESS AND COOLNESS https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6738.msg72759#msg72759
« Reply #10 on: May 22, 2010, 02:00:06 am »
Add a RoF??

abysswalker

  • Guest
Re: SUPER DECK OF AWESOMENESS AND COOLNESS https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6738.msg72762#msg72762
« Reply #11 on: May 22, 2010, 02:19:18 am »
You COULD add a RoF, but I think it would make the deck more cluttered with high-cost cards...that's not good.

 

blarg: