Nosferatu - Immortal vampires deck

[Daxx]

Strictly speaking if you're condensing the deck size properly, you should be maintaining the ratios of creatures:spells:pillars, which doesn't affect the odds of you drawing a specific card (actually, strictly speaking since you have fewer cards in your deck you're actually improving the odds of drawing it by a given turn).

[Nihilus]

I don't understand what you mean, Daxx.
Should I reduce the numbers of novas and pillars?

[RedRevive]

I don't understand what you mean, Daxx.
Should I reduce the numbers of novas and pillars?

Where are the pillars????

Also, I guess if you wanted to go pillarless you could use something like immolation (with RoLs or sparks).  However, you already have enough spell cards so I think that option is out

[Nihilus]

On the other posts RedRevive.
And beside the spell card amount, i've no use to fire quanta and no creature to sacrificate

[PuppyChow]

Strictly speaking if you're condensing the deck size properly, you should be maintaining the ratios of creatures:spells:pillars, which doesn't affect the odds of you drawing a specific card (actually, strictly speaking since you have fewer cards in your deck you're actually improving the odds of drawing it by a given turn).

I was more referring to the fact that you DO sometimes need extra copies of a card than you really need to draw it rather early. I have no problem with trying to make it 30 cards, in fact, I approve of that.

[RedRevive]

On the other posts RedRevive.
And beside the spell card amount, i've no use to fire quanta and no creature to sacrificate

hmm, I thought immolation/cremation gave you 1 of every quanta along with 7-9 fire

[Daxx]

I don't understand what you mean, Daxx.
Should I reduce the numbers of novas and pillars?

Only if you are masively reducing the deck size. Remember, with this deck, you have a hard limit in terms of how many quantums it can generate outside of your mark, so reducing the number of Supernovas will reduce that amount.

Essentially you have a trade-off between reducing the numbers of all your cards in order to improve consistency, and keeping larger numbers of cards so that your potential for dealing damage/generating quantums/etc. is increased. It's the sort of thing you can only really get a feel for in testing. Give it a go, and see what you think!

[bobcamel]

Tried the deck in the trainer. The Vampires tend to come late, or it is just my unluck, but this 12-power unblockable vampiric untouchable creature thing is just pure epicness, I have to admit. I could beat many things with this. Well, haven't tried level 5 yet, but I shall.


HEREBY I EXCLAIM THAT ALTHOUGH I DIDN'T TAKE A PIC, AS IT JUST WENT TOO FAST, THIS DECK, AFTER SLIGHT MODIFICATIONS, BEAT THE CRAP OUT OF DIVINE GLORY. ENJOY.

[Nihilus]

But why marxwell demons?

I'm Thinking about to use anti-mater to stop the enemy damage dealers.

[bobcamel]

One demon, and because my Entropymark lets me build up enough Entropy to use one, and because AI5 plays lotsa dragons.

This, and when the enemoy gets over 80-100 total damage per turn, you're bonked. So, I use Firebucket and Demon to do control a bit to buy myself one-sided time.

[Belthus]

Try this one. It is better with quanta and has more creatures for better speed and balance across elements.