Hover over cards for details, click for permalink
5f2 5f2 5f2 5f2 5f2 5f2 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 61t 61t 61t 61t 61t 61t 62c 62c 62c 62c 62c 62c 8pu
Hey,
I have this Arena-deck - the Oracle card is Turquoise Nymph. I have only tested it agaist Grabbix - so far it beats Grabbix 15 out of 20 times.
I have tried two versions:
HP 180
&
HP 130 + 2X Mark of
Which would do better against a wide array of decks? In my very small sample size they have done almost equally well (against Grabbix).
The deck isn't perfect of course. The main problem is that the AI isn't that good at quinting the dragons. And I don't fullt understand how the AI prioritizes shileds vs. nymphs. Ideally it should play a nymph -> next round quint the nymph -> next round play a dragon and quint it. Then chain shields and play more creatures. I know that's a lot to ask of the AI and of course there would be exceptions to the tactics.
Any suggestions for changes that would improve the deck? No upgrades though.
Hope to hear your ideas.