Mito-HealingFrogs [Unupped]

[Giantfrog]

I am sure this deck has been done before but I don't feel like hunting down the original in the mono life section. Anyways here it is and I am open to suggestions always as far as changing it around.

I played my first pvp 1 match with it and ended up winning with an EM against a  / Deck. It wasnt a aether dim stall so I was glad. anyways here it is.

by Giantfrog

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bu 5bu 5bu 5bu 5bu 5bu 5c2 5c2 5c2 5c3 5c3 5c5 5c6 5c6 5c6 5c9 5c9 5c9 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 8pn

This is the first deck I have submitted tons of other ideas just not finding them to be efficient as of yet.

[Shrink]

Hmm why the pends? Is it to spread out the pillars in case the opponent uses earthquake or Poseidon's ability?

[Giantfrog]

Ya... You never know what an opponent may do if you take it into pvp. I normally would split pillars pends for mono anything. Even if it says just pillars I always split.

[rickerd]

bad thing you don't have anything to destroy, lobo is a pain, daimond shield is always lose.
maybe an idea:
-switch all your pends to pillars and get mark and put in some deflags
-switch all your pends to pillars and get  mark and put in some steals

[willng3]

Hmm yes, shields will likely be a problem to this deck.  Unfortunately the only things Life can do against shields is pray that they do damage faster, outstall it, or splash off-element PC in the deck.

That first tactic isn't going to work well against Wings and Dim Shields.

Second tactic requires you to make a fatter deck.

Third means that the rate you're able to play creatures and other Life cards is going to be slowed, which means that cards like Discord and Earthquake are going to be much more dangerous.  But I guess the decision is ultimately between wanting to deal with Shields or wanting to be prone to those other cards.  Also, you won't need to switch all of your Pillars to Pends for these cards since they don't cost more than 3-4 of their respective quanta.

One more thing:

-switch all your pends to pillars and get mark of  and put in one or two butterfly effects

You can't target Frogs with Butterfly Effect, and I don't see the point of adding low attack creatures just for this reason.

[rickerd]

Hmm yes, shields will likely be a problem to this deck.  Unfortunately the only things Life can do against shields is pray that they do damage faster, outstall it, or splash off-element PC in the deck.

That first tactic isn't going to work well against Wings and Dim Shields.

Second tactic requires you to make a fatter deck.

Third means that the rate you're able to play creatures and other Life cards is going to be slowed, which means that cards like Discord and Earthquake are going to be much more dangerous.  But I guess the decision is ultimately between wanting to deal with Shields or wanting to be prone to those other cards.  Also, you won't need to switch all of your Pillars to Pends for these cards since they don't cost more than 3-4 of their respective quanta.

One more thing:

-switch all your pends to pillars and get mark of  and put in one or two butterfly effects

You can't target Frogs with Butterfly Effect, and I don't see the point of adding low attack creatures just for this reason.

....... no comments 

[Giantfrog]

Ill try deflags or steals and changing mark. The deck idea is obviously better upgraded than not. There are always things I can change here and there. But it will have to wait for a bit I appreciate the inputand will try other things out.

I know Butterfly effect wouldnt work since it has to be a on creature under 3 attack power deflag/Steal would definately be useful. Unupped as it is though is slow and I guess would be just something to play if you were wanting something different.