Oty + Druid Rainbow versus HB

[Chapuz]

How will you attack the opponent? (LOL)  A golem with quint. wouldn't be bad.

A freaking mutant armyyyy CHMD style FTW

[Damage]

How will you attack the opponent? (LOL)  A golem with quint. wouldn't be bad.

A freaking mutant armyyyy CHMD style FTW

 Lol,Chapuz.Sorry,didn't see that but that deck has 1 on druids.Chance for 1/40 at drawing that druid.I am still thinking that golem wouldn't be bad.

[Chapuz]

How will you attack the opponent? (LOL)  A golem with quint. wouldn't be bad.

A freaking mutant armyyyy CHMD style FTW

Lol,Chapuz.Sorry,didn't see that but that deck has 1 on druids.Chance for 1/40 at drawing that druid.I am still thinking that golem wouldn't be bad.

Can Haz Moar Draws is an old FG farmer, from 1.24-1.25, the awsome timebows era.

Yes, I linked a variation I posted on page 12 because I can't see the original one on the main post.

[darkrobe]

oh Can haz more draws.... that brings back memories.

[Einstein Skw]

First of all, thanks for many replys 

FFQ could fit nicely there as another mutation fodder. Another EA for the shield would also be nice. Or changing it to Bone Wall instead.
Also, Sundials.

My second mutation fodder is my Eternity. Not enough?
EA for the shield is not a need. I used that many times before. My conclusion is that without it I may more freely chose to steal an annoying shield from the enemy, like Firewall, Permafrost or Spine Carapace. Bonewall won't be easy to play since, 2 boneyards cost me 10 ...
Sundials used to be very helpful, but they take lots of 'space' on deck, making it slower (i am wrong, right?  )

Lol,Chapuz.Sorry,didn't see that but that deck has 1 on druids.Chance for 1/40 at drawing that druid.I am still thinking that golem wouldn't be bad.

As long as I've been testing the same deck oly adding quint + golem it's a lil better.

 

Can Haz Moar Draws is an old FG farmer, from 1.24-1.25, the awsome timebows era.

Yes, I linked a variation I posted on page 12 because I can't see the original one on the main post.

Thanks a lot for the inspiration! 'Timebows Era' went before I met the game, though is from these time the most nice posts on forum when I started looking at it. These decks made me understand most common strategics, thanks for that!

you can take out 3 or 4 quantum pillars as it is right now and it should still be fine

sundials should help you a lot with rushes and help you make a faster setup

a pharaoh or FFQ (like suggested) could be usefull for mutation fooder or even as nom fooder for oty to make skeletons (wich can turn into random creatures using eternity) and grow your Bone Wall if you decide to add one in the deck

From this ideai I may change 4 pillars for 4 sundials and then try a few more times.

Pharaoh seems nice, but with non-upgraded sundials the  will be very needed. FFQ are gona be expensive for  usage since I have druids and 2 Feral Bonds. Maybe if I could replace FB for other strong heal source... I own 6 SoG, but took'em out of this idea a long time ago because are very targeted and not so much healing.



Considering all nice ideas I will from now on try the following version. Please comment on it.

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 592 5f6 5f8 5fa 5ia 5lm 5lm 5ro 5rp 5rp 5rp 5rp 5rp 5up 621 621 621 6u6 717 717 74b 74b 7am 7am 7gp 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q8 8ps

[Chapuz]

Spoiler for Hidden:

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 592 5f6 5f8 5fa 5ia 5lm 5lm 5ro 5rp 5rp 5rp 5rp 5rp 5up 621 621 621 6u6 717 717 74b 74b 7am 7am 7gp 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q8 8ps

You will want to have 3 quintesences and 4 hourglasses.
Remove that useless Sundials, they were key cards when the delay was of 2 turns instead of 1 (for eating + mutation) but now they are a waste of space in timebows.
And about the defense of the deck, a good recommendation is to have variety of shields: permafrost, fog and gravity at least. And a 2nd protect artefact, as you may want to have 1 for the weapon and another one for the shield.

[Damage]

that looks pretty good, actually. not sure if you really need 3 hourglasses, unless you plan to bait for PC, which is fine (albeit expensive, if you ask me).

.
.
.

what is your top target for enchant artifact? the shield or the eternity? maybe you could take out rain of fire for a second one? RoF seems overkill considering you've got a quinted oty, but i may be wrong...

In fact, seems much hourglasses, but I was actually thinking of geting one more! lol That is because often they come after 3-8 turns, to late agains most rushers. And yes, they are good as bait, not so expensive because of  mark.

Enchant is for Eternity, can't rely on victory without it.

Rain of fire saves me when i face many poisonous creatures or against HB who gives too much health to their creatures with plate armor/ Basilisk.

For upgrading order I was considering Rain of Fire for considerable cost drop and then pillars. The others, costing 4 or less are not too hard to put in game.

How will you attack the opponent? (LOL)  A golem with quint. wouldn't be bad.

Very good pointing, Damage. Sometimes the games becomes excessively long because of low damage. I avoided doing so to keep low deck size. I will start trying now a 42 cards for your suggestion. I don't think that I will need more pillars, right?

 Dont make it 42 cards. Just take out 2 quantum pillars and replace'em with a golem and a quint.You are producing so much quanta.

[Damage]

Hey,by the way,take out that deflag and add a Butterfly Effect,an entropy card can fit in.

[Chapuz]

Dont make it 42 cards. Just take out 2 quantum pillars and replace'em with a golem and a quint.You are producing so much quanta.

A timebow can have 50 cards with no problems at all, if you have the correct amount of Hourglasses.

Hey,by the way,take out that deflag and add a Butterfly Effect,an entropy card can fit in.

Yep, that's right.

@Damage, next time try modifying the last post you make instead of making a double post.

[Absol]

You will want to have 3 quintesences and 4 hourglasses.
Remove that useless Sundials, they were key cards when the delay was of 2 turns instead of 1 (for eating + mutation) but now they are a waste of space in timebows.
And about the defense of the deck, a good recommendation is to have variety of shields: permafrost, fog and gravity at least. And a 2nd protect artefact, as you may want to have 1 for the weapon and another one for the shield.

Not true. While Sundials are so good when it delayed 2 turns, even 1 turn is still worthwhile. It won't slow your deck down because it has innate Hasten anyway.

Graveyard doesn't have to be upped, since it will be mutation fodder anyway (except using Eternity, which is still small chance). By not upping it, you save 2 per Boneyard (4 total). Add one more and 1 card slot, you can have Bonewall.

Other good shields including: Permafrost Shield (haxx damage reduction), Jade Shield (2 DR + innate PA), Spine Carapace (to soften things for Oty)

[Chapuz]

Graveyard doesn't have to be upped, since it will be mutation fodder anyway (except using Eternity, which is still small chance). By not upping it, you save 2 per Boneyard (4 total). Add one more and 1 card slot, you can have Bonewall.

Boneyard must be upped because an early-mid eternity produces an upped army. Old timebows have them unupped because it was before the skele buff.

While Sundials are so good when it delayed 2 turns, even 1 turn is still worthwhile. It won't slow your deck down because it has innate Hasten anyway.

Matter of taste I think. You have the hasten skill but you get 1 turn later the card just under the sundial.

[Damage]

Dont make it 42 cards. Just take out 2 quantum pillars and replace'em with a golem and a quint.You are producing so much quanta.

A timebow can have 50 cards with no problems at all, if you have the correct amount of Hourglasses.

Hey,by the way,take out that deflag and add a Butterfly Effect,an entropy card can fit in.

Yep, that's right.

@Damage, next time try modifying the last post you make instead of making a double post.

 Sorry,I didn't have time. I just wrote it.