*Author

eh pewwwp

  • Guest
Control freak?!?!? ME?!?!?!? now way https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11464.msg141043#msg141043
« on: August 18, 2010, 02:11:25 am »
Code: [Select]
55r 55r 55r 568 568 58s 58s 58v 58v 58v 58v 58v 744 744 744 744 744 744 744 744 78q 78q 78q 78q 78q 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n2
I call it my control freak deck. It's simple, oty for cc, pulvy for perm control, nymphs for quanta control

there's no quanta problems, and theres 2 reasons why its only the towers and pendulums are upgraded
1. to keep quanta consumption normal, they need that quick bonus
2. thats all i have the money for, as soon as i get more I'm upgrading the oty

The question mark cards are the earth pendulum

I've only tested it on t50, and it went 10-2 (one of the wins being a farm deck) and EM three times

please test it for me, on any level, and give me feed back and anything i can do to tweak this and so I can move it to the duo-trio-quartet section

eh pewwwp

  • Guest
Re: pulvy nymph deck https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11464.msg141120#msg141120
« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2010, 05:22:32 am »
nobody? come on

Offline lava golem

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 706
  • Reputation Power: 0
  • lava golem is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • Fire
Re: pulvy nymph deck https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11464.msg141740#msg141740
« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2010, 03:28:20 am »
Off topic I suppose: but you do have to wait a day or two before your post gets replies, it's not like you'll get a reply in the first few minutes. Plus, the people on forums are more interested in FG countering decks, other decks aren't that popular. I'm sure many people have just skipped through decks simply because it doesn't make them money. Plus, maybe the decks isn't that good, concept isn't as good.
lava golems are the best creatures in the game cause I said so

Offline lava golem

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 706
  • Reputation Power: 0
  • lava golem is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • Fire
Re: pulvy nymph deck https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11464.msg141743#msg141743
« Reply #3 on: August 19, 2010, 03:30:28 am »
Code: [Select]
55r 55r 55r 568 568 58s 58s 58v 58v 58v 58v 58v 744 744 744 744 744 744 744 744 78q 78q 78q 78q 78q 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n2
I call it my control freak deck. It's simple, oty for cc, pulvy for perm control, nymphs for quanta control

there's no quanta problems, and theres 2 reasons why its only the towers and pendulums are upgraded
1. to keep quanta consumption normal, they need that quick bonus
2. thats all i have the money for, as soon as i get more I'm upgrading the oty

The question mark cards are the earth pendulum

I've only tested it on t50, and it went 10-2 (one of the wins being a farm deck) and EM three times

please test it for me, on any level, and give me feed back and anything i can do to tweak this and so I can move it to the duo-trio-quartet section
Another reason is that no one really has 2 amber nymphs, what are the empty card slots?
lava golems are the best creatures in the game cause I said so

eh pewwwp

  • Guest
Re: pulvy nymph deck https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11464.msg141756#msg141756
« Reply #4 on: August 19, 2010, 03:45:05 am »
Code: [Select]
55r 55r 55r 568 568 58s 58s 58v 58v 58v 58v 58v 744 744 744 744 744 744 744 744 78q 78q 78q 78q 78q 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n2
I call it my control freak deck. It's simple, oty for cc, pulvy for perm control, nymphs for quanta control

there's no quanta problems, and theres 2 reasons why its only the towers and pendulums are upgraded
1. to keep quanta consumption normal, they need that quick bonus
2. thats all i have the money for, as soon as i get more I'm upgrading the oty

The question mark cards are the earth pendulum


I've only tested it on t50, and it went 10-2 (one of the wins being a farm deck) and EM three times

please test it for me, on any level, and give me feed back and anything i can do to tweak this and so I can move it to the duo-trio-quartet section
Another reason is that no one really has 2 amber nymphs, what are the empty card slots?
lol already answered

and how do they know if it doesn't kill FG's if they don't test it so it can be tweak and changed
as for the money, if you can easily grind t50, you get a ton of cash, plus cash from selling rares

as for the nymphs, I made a deck of cards that I have, so I have those, if they dont, replaces the nymphs and otys with black holes, yes that'll make it more like other ones that are posted but hey, mine is only a twist off of those

and you're deck/concept theory, it works, hence the 10-2 in t50, I just wanted people to test it themselves, and give me their feedback for change

Offline lava golem

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 706
  • Reputation Power: 0
  • lava golem is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • Fire
Re: pulvy nymph deck https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11464.msg141760#msg141760
« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2010, 03:51:15 am »
I'm just saying, there are other t50 farming decks out there without using rares (nymphs) and do the same and some even better. Oh, right didn't see that bit about the pendulums, I thought pendulums had a code already? Oh well.
lava golems are the best creatures in the game cause I said so

eh pewwwp

  • Guest
Re: pulvy nymph deck https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11464.msg141765#msg141765
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2010, 03:52:54 am »
I'm just saying, there are other t50 farming decks out there without using rares (nymphs) and do the same and some even better. Oh, right didn't see that bit about the pendulums, I thought pendulums had a code already? Oh well.
have you tried this out in trainer? If not, you can't really say that this deck doesn't hold up well compared to others

Offline lava golem

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 706
  • Reputation Power: 0
  • lava golem is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • Fire
Re: Control freak?!?!? ME?!?!?!? now way https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11464.msg141774#msg141774
« Reply #7 on: August 19, 2010, 04:06:46 am »
Heh, I see you have changed the name :). I'm not saying this deck is bad, I'm just saying there are others which require less... rares? I guess? I just tested this in trainer, I got off to some bad starts but when this decks gets working it's quite fun, although with all cards upgraded is much better. But for grinding, I would think many people would choose shrieker rush or this:
Code: [Select]
5f2 5f2 5f2 6rl 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7ds 7ds 7ds 809 809 809 809 over this deck. Although those decks are good for grinding, it's missing the bits this deck is focused on: fun! So decks have pros and cons.
lava golems are the best creatures in the game cause I said so

UsernameLife

  • Guest
Re: Control freak?!?!? ME?!?!?!? now way https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11464.msg141779#msg141779
« Reply #8 on: August 19, 2010, 04:11:02 am »
I think upgrading the Otys is a must in this kind of deck. It greatly increases the number of creature an unbuffed oty can eat, and also helps against some creature control.
IIRC, both Oty and Amber nymph are high priority targets for creature controls, and that's what really kills this deck. However, it's not very practical to splash in aether for quints (I've tried before, but maybe with these pendulums you can make it work.?)
Also, these types of control decks are rather slow. If you're facing a rush deck with creatures 3 or above HP, you're probably going to lose right away. Upgrading the Otys can help here, but I might consider adding even one or two more to ensure an early oty and draw some creature control. Even though your deck is already pretty gravity-heavy (lol?) gravity shields could be very helpful (basically the only creatures that can pass the shield are ones your Otyughs can eat).

tl;dr
Upgrade Otyughs
+1 or 2 otys
drop titanium shield for gravity shield
(quints? but that would really slow down the deck)


Also, I wouldn't consider this deck for T50 simply because most of those decks are either rainbows (creature control), speed rainbows, or rushes. Even RoL/Hope could defeat this with an early lobo.

eh pewwwp

  • Guest
Re: Control freak?!?!? ME?!?!?!? now way https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11464.msg141780#msg141780
« Reply #9 on: August 19, 2010, 04:13:04 am »
Heh, I see you have changed the name :). I'm not saying this deck is bad, I'm just saying there are others which require less... rares? I guess? I just tested this in trainer, I got off to some bad starts but when this decks gets working it's quite fun, although with all cards upgraded is much better. But for grinding, I would think many people would choose shrieker rush or this:
Code: [Select]
5f2 5f2 5f2 6rl 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7ds 7ds 7ds 809 809 809 809 over this deck. Although those decks are good for grinding, it's missing the bits this deck is focused on: fun! So decks have pros and cons.
lol well with this deck, if you play it right, can stop your rush deck, yes i get what your saying about the rares, but if you et this together, it can stop pretty much every deck

as for the changing the name thing... I have no idea what you mean  :P

eh pewwwp

  • Guest
Re: Control freak?!?!? ME?!?!?!? now way https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11464.msg141785#msg141785
« Reply #10 on: August 19, 2010, 04:18:42 am »
Upgrade Otyughs
+1 or 2 otys
drop titanium shield for gravity shield
(quints? but that would really slow down the deck)

Also, I wouldn't consider this deck for T50 simply because most of those decks are either rainbows (creature control), speed rainbows, or rushes. Even RoL/Hope could defeat this with an early lobo.
the otys, like i said if you read it carefully, were not upgraded because I didnt have the money
adding more cards would make it even slower

it actually works well against rainbows because of the nymphs and pulvy's effects, even try it out in trainer. and the rushes are the reason for the titaniums, all the creatures in those deck have hp less than 6, so it would be useless

like i keep saying, test it out yourself about 10 times then give your judgement instead of speculating

UsernameLife

  • Guest
Re: Control freak?!?!? ME?!?!?!? now way https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=11464.msg141816#msg141816
« Reply #11 on: August 19, 2010, 05:43:22 am »
Upgrade Otyughs
+1 or 2 otys
drop titanium shield for gravity shield
(quints? but that would really slow down the deck)

Also, I wouldn't consider this deck for T50 simply because most of those decks are either rainbows (creature control), speed rainbows, or rushes. Even RoL/Hope could defeat this with an early lobo.
the otys, like i said if you read it carefully, were not upgraded because I didnt have the money
adding more cards would make it even slower

it actually works well against rainbows because of the nymphs and pulvy's effects, even try it out in trainer. and the rushes are the reason for the titaniums, all the creatures in those deck have hp less than 6, so it would be useless

like i keep saying, test it out yourself about 10 times then give your judgement instead of speculating
Results of 10 tests vs Top 50 in Trainer
Lost vs life rush (couldn't eat and no damage)
Win vs CCwhybother (2nd turn amber nymph)
Lost vs life rush
Lost vs timebow (early quinted oty ate everything)
Lost vs SNwhybother (oty ate everything, led to deckout)
Win vs CCwhybother
Lost vs fractal pests (couldn't eat and got locked)
Win vs RoL/Hope (early Pulvy vs early lobo+quanta denial)
Lost vs flying eagle eyes
Lost vs fractal pests

Total 30% win percentage (granted, this sample size sucks)
Total testing time ~30 minutes for 10 games (include 3 skipped farms)

My judgement on this deck: Good concepts, but it's too slow. Could possibly work in pvp1 if you added some heavy armors.

I'm most likely not commenting further on this deck, as you asked for suggestions then simply refuted all of mine. Testing this deck also takes up a lot of time.

 

anything
blarg: