Try not to crap your pants

[Syoxis]

This deck is so fun to play.

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 77i 77i 7an 7an 7an 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dh 7dh 7dh 7dh 7dh 7dh 7dl 7dl 7dl 7dn 7dn 7dn 80h 80h 80h 8pj

This was inspired by an earlier post that was running in duo/trio decks http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,5769.0.html

Thank you to lune69 for the idea

EDIT: Update: Current deck, based on feedback.  It is significantly better.  Still looking for others to play test and give feedback.

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4vj 4vj 4vj 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u7 6u7 77i 77i 7an 7an 7an 7dh 7dh 7dh 7dh 7dh 7dh 7dm 7dm 7dn 7dn 7dn 7n0 7n0 7n2 80h 80h 80h 8pj

EDIT2: Current variety (7/28/10).  I decided to take another look at this deck.  I was able to make it much more consistent, yet less fun.  Of course, you could argue that winning more often is more fun.

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4vj 4vj 4vj 4vj 7an 7an 7an 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dh 7dh 7dh 7dh 7dh 7dh 7dm 7dm 7dm 7dn 7dn 7dn 7dn 7n0 7n0 7n2 7n2 7n2 8pn

[Retribution]

I assume you adrenaline brimstone eaters for 4 fire quanta a turn and 8 damage?
Sounds good to bump up fahreinheit!

I think you should throw in some explosions, a fire shield or thorn carapace could really screw you up 

[Syoxis]

Thats a good point, although I don't know where I could fit them in.  It would also be nice to get rid of phase shields.  I could probably drop one tower and count on the mulligan, but I would like to have at least 2 explosions if I was putting them in. 

Maybe -1 tower, -1 fire buckler, +2 explosion

Edit: After some more testing, I think having the third fire buckler is important. 

You may actually want to take out 2 towers for 2 explosions and count on the mulligan.  You will still have a pretty good chance of getting a tower first turn.

[Glitch]

I might add in flying weapon...

[Demagog]

It won't kill you to go over thirty cards, you know. Just add in two explosions.

[Syoxis]

It won't kill you to go over thirty cards, you know. Just add in two explosions.

I usually am not too picky about going over 30 cards.  The problem here is that you need 2 supernovas to get out the epinephrine and quint.  Every extra card lowers that probability.

[Retribution]

Do you really need the quints?

[sSethia]

I think you should just make this a duo with life and fire. Trying to keep this huge concept within 30 cards AND adding explosions will hurt the deck. I would try to make it less complicated.

[Syoxis]

There is a duo fire/life deck in the thread linked in the original post.  If you prefer a less complicated deck, that one could easily be adapted to add some explosions. 

[DrunkDestroyer]

I might add in flying weapon...

Seconded. Replace a quint with a flying weapon, and you can double your farenheights.

Love that you can adrenaline enemies to kill them faster.

[unionruler]

Why are you using fire bucklers instead of say improved fog? If your opponent had enough damage output his creatures would kill you even if some of them died along the way. You could actually put in one improved antimatter since you're using  mark.

Recommended modifications: -3 fire buckler, -1 protect artifact, +2 improved fog, +2 improved antimatter, -1 quint, +1 flying weapon

[Svenningen]

-1 buckler, 1protect artifact and -1 quint

+2 explosions +1 flying wep