Rush Series: Darkness

[Zarovich]

Ahhh...One of the best rush decks out there! So powerful and quick to play! Ok, here is the breakdown:

by Zarovich

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5ul 5ul 5ul 5ul 5ul 5ul 5um 5um 5up 5up 5up 5uq 5uq 5ut 5ut 5ut 5ut 8pt

Also Very Simple. Play Devourers first; taking early quanta can tear up someone's strategy. Play dragons when possible, after you have all of your devourers in play. Save up for drain life and steal any pesky permanents or anything that would give you an advantage. Sometimes Nightfall should be used, in case of a shield or anything that would affect your devourers when they do damage. Time shield and Water shield will freeze your devourers, not letting them take quanta, which is one of the biggest problems with this deck. That's why the Earth Mark is OPTIONAL so you can burrow if wanted.

PRO'S

• Wins OFTEN in PVP battles
• Can easily grind Level 3 Elementals for quick and easy money
• Relatively cheap

CON'S

• Can be weak to creature control and shields

This deck is definitely one of the most powerful. I started my friend off with this deck for his first time EVER playing, and he beat 3 people in a row in PVP, 1 with all cards upgraded. VERY GOOD for beginner's or grinders! TRY IT!

[icybraker]

The title of your decks are often a misnomer. If it truly was a "rush" deck, you would concentrated solely on the offense, thus eliminating the need for Devourers. For a real "rush" deck, I'd swap the 6 devourers for 5 minor vampires and one more pillar.

[Bloodshadow]

First, no deck image. Deck images are required in those sections.

Second, this is not a rush deck. For a "pure" rush deck, I'd use 6 Devourers, 6 Dragons, 6 Drain Life, 1 Nightfall, and the rest pillars. Well, maybe some tweaking is required, but that's generally how I'd go with a Darkness rush deck. You don't need any defenses with AI3.

But still, I'd never use Darkness at all for AI3 grinding because Darkness is not fast. I'd rather just use Shrieker spam, which is much, much faster.

[Zarovich]

these decks aren't ONLY for grinding though. I think that devourers let you put out your creature faster. Thanks for the comments.

[jo_jo_the_joker]

The title of your decks are often a misnomer. If it truly was a "rush" deck, you would concentrated solely on the offense, thus eliminating the need for Devourers. For a real "rush" deck, I'd swap the 6 devourers for 5 minor vampires and one more pillar.

i agree

[L3GiT_Ac1D]

The title of your decks are often a misnomer. If it truly was a "rush" deck, you would concentrated solely on the offense, thus eliminating the need for Devourers. For a real "rush" deck, I'd swap the 6 devourers for 5 minor vampires and one more pillar.

But there are only 2 devourers in this deck.

[willng3]

The title of your decks are often a misnomer. If it truly was a "rush" deck, you would concentrated solely on the offense, thus eliminating the need for Devourers. For a real "rush" deck, I'd swap the 6 devourers for 5 minor vampires and one more pillar.

But there are only 2 devourers in this deck.

...which means the deck must have been modified after that post was made.  Please don't revive topics that are over 2 years old for things like this.

[L3GiT_Ac1D]

The title of your decks are often a misnomer. If it truly was a "rush" deck, you would concentrated solely on the offense, thus eliminating the need for Devourers. For a real "rush" deck, I'd swap the 6 devourers for 5 minor vampires and one more pillar.

But there are only 2 devourers in this deck.

...which means the deck must have been modified after that post was made.  Please don't revive topics that are over 2 years old for things like this.

Well im sorry i didnt know it was that old :l but thank you for letting me know