Post by: truddy02 on August 04, 2010, 06:09:31 pm
The idea is straight denial. I tested it against AI3 and was dominate but I never faced another darkness deck which would be a problem. Against a darkness deck you may be able to nightmare dragons if you can get one out and keep your opponents quanta low but otherwise you would be screwed.
Strategy:
Play devourers first. Then play nightmares so the opponent cannot draw for more towers. Then steal any towers they have out (or any pesky shields or weapons). Then when the opponent is locked down play the dragons and win.
Post by: TheonlyrealBeef on August 27, 2010, 08:44:20 pm
Post by: Blasting-Light on September 19, 2010, 07:36:27 pm
Only 8 :darkness pillars, You can like only get 2 pillars and 4 dragons in the start, thus, making you almost lose the game, with little chances of winning.
Post by: miniwally on September 19, 2010, 07:37:22 pm
Doesn't this deck give so many bad draws?The devourers also act as pillars as well boosting it to 14.
Only 8 :darkness pillars, You can like only get 2 pillars and 4 dragons in the start, thus, making you almost lose the game, with little chances of winning.
Post by: Blasting-Light on September 20, 2010, 07:44:31 pm
I know they work as pillars to, but they can be easily defeated, only 2 HP, with a single drain life or anything else can kill them easily. By the way, like I said in the other reply, you've got more then 50% of getting more bad hands.Doesn't this deck give so many bad draws?The devourers also act as pillars as well boosting it to 14.
Only 8 :darkness pillars, You can like only get 2 pillars and 4 dragons in the start, thus, making you almost lose the game, with little chances of winning.
Post by: TheonlyrealBeef on September 20, 2010, 08:30:53 pm
With 8 pillars in a 30 card deck the chance of not getting any pillars in the first 7 cards is only 0.15%, so it depends on what you define to be a bad hand. One Pillar and the mark are enough to get a devourer out at turn 2 (unless you get really, really crappy hands and don't start with those, either). Though it could definetly use less Dragons, 4 or maybe even 3 would do the trick. Maybe add dusk shield/pillars instead. Or Drain Life.I know they work as pillars to, but they can be easily defeated, only 2 HP, with a single drain life or anything else can kill them easily. By the way, like I said in the other reply, you've got more then 50% of getting more bad hands.Doesn't this deck give so many bad draws?The devourers also act as pillars as well boosting it to 14.
Only 8 :darkness pillars, You can like only get 2 pillars and 4 dragons in the start, thus, making you almost lose the game, with little chances of winning.
Post by: Toimu13 on September 24, 2010, 02:13:46 am
Post by: truddy02 on September 24, 2010, 02:29:35 am
This is a good idea. Probably 3 dragons and 3 siphon lifes would work good to kill any creatures they get out early or use as a finishing blow.With 8 pillars in a 30 card deck the chance of not getting any pillars in the first 7 cards is only 0.15%, so it depends on what you define to be a bad hand. One Pillar and the mark are enough to get a devourer out at turn 2 (unless you get really, really crappy hands and don't start with those, either). Though it could definetly use less Dragons, 4 or maybe even 3 would do the trick. Maybe add dusk shield/pillars instead. Or Drain Life.I know they work as pillars to, but they can be easily defeated, only 2 HP, with a single drain life or anything else can kill them easily. By the way, like I said in the other reply, you've got more then 50% of getting more bad hands.Doesn't this deck give so many bad draws?The devourers also act as pillars as well boosting it to 14.
Only 8 :darkness pillars, You can like only get 2 pillars and 4 dragons in the start, thus, making you almost lose the game, with little chances of winning.