Paladin | Elite Paladin

[CrockettRocket]

Put the healing before the skill; no line.

Couldn't just simply deleting the line work? o.O

[foofatron]

See devourer. Needs a distinction between passive and skill.

[CrockettRocket]

See devourer. Needs a distinction between passive and skill.

Oh derp. Thnx.

[Calambar]

Format changed = I put the passive skill at the beginning like in:
.
Still don't know if it is correct as probably the name of active skill should be in separate line. I did not have enough space though so I wrote ":" after the name of skill. Is it acceptable?

[nireus]

Nice card idea Krzy! I'd like to mention though just a few things: The passive ability (since it doesn't require any quanta to be activated) seems to me as pretty strong compared to Guardian Angel's for example with the only difference, of course, that it can't be applied to another creature. The active skill on the other hand is a combination of Ablaze and Momentum, requiring only 1 which also seems OP even if it's not a permanent ability. I don't think there's any other creature card in the game combining 2 skills in 1 with such a low cost. The summoning cost however is high, making it the 2nd most quanta expensive light creature card so it's kinda balancing the card's power. I'd suggest therefore reducing the cost by -1 and increasing the active skill's cost by 1 .

[Calambar]

Nice card idea Krzy! I'd like to mention though just a few things: The passive ability (since it doesn't require any quanta to be activated) seems to me as pretty strong compared to Guardian Angel's for example with the only difference, of course, that it can't be applied to another creature. The active skill on the other hand is a combination of Ablaze and Momentum, requiring only 1 which also seems OP even if it's not a permanent ability. I don't think there's any other creature card in the game combining 2 skills in 1 with such a low cost. The summoning cost however is high, making it the 2nd most quanta expensive light creature card so it's kinda balancing the card's power. I'd suggest therefore reducing the cost by -1 and increasing the active skill's cost by 1 .

Thanks for the suggestions nireus I can't agree active skill is OP, unsoppable costs only 1  and gives creature +1/+1, permanently... Paladin's skill lasts only one turn and gives +2/+0 instead of +1/+1 so it's practically the same. My logic was also actually not to force  duo, but give possibility to hit at least once through a shield (for example final blow) with nova...

I also don't want to abandon healing idea as without this, the paladin theme seems incomplete to me Thus, I don't want to decrease creature cost as well, in order not to make this creature OP.

Of course I'm open to further suggestions and I may change my mind if I get more feedback.

You may also comment on my two more recent earth cards, if you wish of course, Mud Cannon and Mud Eater as I appreciate your feedback a lot

[Annele]

Format changed = I put the passive skill at the beginning like in:
.
Still don't know if it is correct as probably the name of active skill should be in separate line. I did not have enough space though so I wrote ":" after the name of skill. Is it acceptable?

You could put it beforehand, like "Charge:  : ability"

Also, I don't see how charging can increase health. Because it is a different ability to momentum (different name) maybe consider changing the gain to +2|0? I don't think it's be unbalanced because you have to keep pumping quanta at it. Just a thought.

[iancudorinmarian]

I know is all about healing and high hp, but why combine the two and add a high atk as well?
Remove the healing part, though you might need to reduce the cost a bit this way.

[Calambar]

Format changed = I put the passive skill at the beginning like in:
.
Still don't know if it is correct as probably the name of active skill should be in separate line. I did not have enough space though so I wrote ":" after the name of skill. Is it acceptable?

You could put it beforehand, like "Charge:  : ability"

Also, I don't see how charging can increase health. Because it is a different ability to momentum (different name) maybe consider changing the gain to +2|0? I don't think it's be unbalanced because you have to keep pumping quanta at it. Just a thought.

Ermm, healing is passive :/ Charging does not increse health. And charging indeed give +2/+0 right now... Please, check the card one more time.

I know is all about healing and high hp, but why combine the two and add a high atk as well?
Remove the healing part, though you might need to reduce the cost a bit this way.

I have written it here before, paladin without healing is incomplete for me. I'm inspired by paladin from Warcraft II. Old game, but you may check

[Vangelios]

I liked it, mainly because it does combo with acceleration and rage potion, I also think that light needs a rush creature

[iloveashley3]

I liked it, mainly because it does combo with acceleration and rage potion, I also think that light needs a rush creature

how is it a "rush" creature with a 8 cost?

BUT anyway, krzy, just lower the the HP healing by 1, so it heals 4 instead of 5. that way you dont really need to lower the summoning cost of the card or the amount to use its ability..

[skyironsword]

The paladin makes me think moreso of Frederick from Fire Emblem: Awakening... Practically unkillable, and charges the !@#$ out of everyone...

On topic, I think it's good as is.