Zombie | Zombie

[qetuol]

NAME: Zombie ELEMENT: Death COST: 1 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: N|2 TEXT: Poisoned. Crowd: N = number of zombies you control at the end of the turn, up to 7.	NAME: Zombie ELEMENT: Death COST: 1 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: N|2 TEXT: Poisoned. Crowd: N = number of zombies you control at the end of the turn, up to 8.

ART: http://www.pics24h.com/zombie-art-collection/ IDEA: qetuol NOTES: No copyright claimed. http://www.pics24h.com/about/ SERIES: -

 

[cookiepirate]

wows
AMAZING CARD
i see how you tried to make it not fractalable, but if you wanted to do that, i suggest making it 2hp

[crystalmakwer]

Great idea!!! But i think too powerful with 4 hp.....!

[karis]

poisoned creature is a great idea.  and it will be greater if it be death creature.  i'm ever made something like this (zombie/ghoul   but don't have picture  that's why you can't even see it in crucible)   and look like so many one like it!   

btw.  if you say  4 hp for poisoned creature with cost 2  is a bit high.  why don't you look at    creature that have 2   in upgraded too. 

[Flayne]

nice idea! especially if fractalled, but lower defense to 3

[March_Wizard]

Nice card!

The picture is nice, but even though that website doesn't claim ownership, that is pretty clearly a zombie Wolverine, from the X-men. >_>

[qetuol]

i think making it 3 hp is too underpowered without fractal. what about making 2 hp and lowering the cost to 2 and 1

[cookiepirate]

poisoned creature is a great idea.  and it will be greater if it be death creature.  i'm ever made something like this (zombie/ghoul   but don't have picture  that's why you can't even see it in crucible)   and look like so many one like it!   

btw.  if you say  4 hp for poisoned creature with cost 2  is a bit high.  why don't you look at    creature that have 2   in upgraded too. 

um
fractal= 9 zombies= 81 damage for 4 turns, all adding up to 10 , and 27
 and thats UNUPED!!!

tell me again cost 2 is a bit high

[karis]

that doesn't matter how many turn.  in the reallity  if you face that combo and don't have anything to defence yourself.   only 2 turn is enough to kill you.     even make it have 2 hp don't help anything.

for me.  this card have a problem with swarm atk.   but why all your people think this card have a problem with HP?     

it attack have same mechanic as scarub but that card is  HP.   that why it don't be imbalance with fractal.   think about it carefully.

[qetuol]

that doesn't matter how many turn.  in the reallity  if you face that combo and don't have anything to defence yourself.   only 2 turn is enough to kill you.     even make it have 2 hp don't help anything.

for me.  this card have a problem with swarm atk.   but why all your people think this card have a problem with HP?     

it attack have same mechanic as scarub but that card is  HP.   that why it don't be imbalance with fractal.   think about it carefully.

you have right, its totally the same if it has 4 hp or 3 or 2

[OldTrees]

The cite you linked to claims no copyright because it is not the authors of the art. It claims to have cited the art so you could try to trace the origins of the art or you can find new art. Thank you very much for you attempt at finding copyright free art.

This card will only be used with fractal because otherwise it takes too slow to accumulate a reasonable amount in your hand.

3 total damage per 1 quanta would put this on par with the theoretical dissection of Spark|Ball Lightning.

[EvaRia]

I agree.

It's a nice card, but there;s no reason to put this in a deck without fractal.

That makes it a very one-track card.

A good way to give it more use is to make a generator of some sort. That way you can make a proper strategy around it rather than relying on fractal abuse.