Tidal Pull | Tidal Pull

[rickerd]

I agree with Chapuz,
2|1 is good but I don't think much deck will use it

[Vineroz]

An  card that requieres  to make    sounds quite weird fun... <--- Fixed

As it's a trio card, I would put the cost just in 2|1.

In a rainbow, it may be usefull in:
. charging an ice lance
. gain quanta for permafrost in a rainbow
. charge quanta for squid's skill.
. Gain some quanta to make the inundation don't die.

Didn't say "to play puffer fish" or things like that because I assume a balanced rainbow has enough quanta to play the creatures. Also, trident + BH seems less viable because it consumes gravity.

In conclution, I don't think it would have many uses.

can't you people just see how powerful Trident + Black Hole is?

[Chapuz]

An  card that requieres  to make    sounds quite weird fun... <--- Fixed

As it's a trio card, I would put the cost just in 2|1.

In a rainbow, it may be usefull in:
. charging an ice lance
. gain quanta for permafrost in a rainbow
. charge quanta for squid's skill.
. Gain some quanta to make the inundation don't die.

Didn't say "to play puffer fish" or things like that because I assume a balanced rainbow has enough quanta to play the creatures. Also, trident + BH seems less viable because it consumes gravity.

In conclution, I don't think it would have many uses.

can't you people just see how powerful Trident + Black Hole is?

Yes. Only when trident is casten on the first 3 turns. After early game, it's useless because the oponent has quanta and enough stuff played. That's why everyone use earthquakes.

[Vineroz]

An  card that requieres  to make    sounds quite weird fun... <--- Fixed

As it's a trio card, I would put the cost just in 2|1.

In a rainbow, it may be usefull in:
. charging an ice lance
. gain quanta for permafrost in a rainbow
. charge quanta for squid's skill.
. Gain some quanta to make the inundation don't die.

Didn't say "to play puffer fish" or things like that because I assume a balanced rainbow has enough quanta to play the creatures. Also, trident + BH seems less viable because it consumes gravity.

In conclution, I don't think it would have many uses.

can't you people just see how powerful Trident + Black Hole is?

Yes. Only when trident is casten on the first 3 turns. After early game, it's useless because the oponent has quanta and enough stuff played. That's why everyone use earthquakes.

In fact, Trident would be MORE powerful in mid game, since you can also pack EQs that take care of early pillars.

[Chapuz]

An  card that requieres  to make    sounds quite weird fun... <--- Fixed

As it's a trio card, I would put the cost just in 2|1.

In a rainbow, it may be usefull in:
. charging an ice lance
. gain quanta for permafrost in a rainbow
. charge quanta for squid's skill.
. Gain some quanta to make the inundation don't die.

Didn't say "to play puffer fish" or things like that because I assume a balanced rainbow has enough quanta to play the creatures. Also, trident + BH seems less viable because it consumes gravity.

In conclution, I don't think it would have many uses.

can't you people just see how powerful Trident + Black Hole is?

Yes. Only when trident is casten on the first 3 turns. After early game, it's useless because the oponent has quanta and enough stuff played. That's why everyone use earthquakes.

In fact, Trident would be MORE powerful in mid game, since you can also pack EQs that take care of early pillars.

The games are usually not so long, if you deny enough at the beginning you surely won. Think about it before writing, please.

[Vineroz]

An  card that requieres  to make    sounds quite weird fun... <--- Fixed

As it's a trio card, I would put the cost just in 2|1.

In a rainbow, it may be usefull in:
. charging an ice lance
. gain quanta for permafrost in a rainbow
. charge quanta for squid's skill.
. Gain some quanta to make the inundation don't die.

Didn't say "to play puffer fish" or things like that because I assume a balanced rainbow has enough quanta to play the creatures. Also, trident + BH seems less viable because it consumes gravity.

In conclution, I don't think it would have many uses.

can't you people just see how powerful Trident + Black Hole is?

Yes. Only when trident is casten on the first 3 turns. After early game, it's useless because the oponent has quanta and enough stuff played. That's why everyone use earthquakes.

In fact, Trident would be MORE powerful in mid game, since you can also pack EQs that take care of early pillars.

The games are usually not so long, if you deny enough at the beginning you surely won. Think about it before writing, please.

"if you deny enough at the beginning you surely won" <-- Really? Currently EQ+BH decks are definitely not common, at least not considered "strong", because of its lack of winning condition. Unless you can COMPLETELY deny your opponent, EQ and BH are situational cards.

[Daguerreo]

Seems expansive... and I don't understand why an card

[ARTHANASIOS]

I like the idea and the  / synergy, however I don't get why to mess up with a third element ( ). About Trident/Poseidon, it is not as bad as most people think and dragons (especially the upped ones) require lots of mana to be played. I have lost because of Trident's tsunami a couple of times, since I was unable to play my Jade Dragon.