Telenergy | Telenergy

[Rutarete]

Then i suggest raising the damage from 2 to something like 4 or 5 (or just raise it in general)

[Ekki]

Then you still have the problem of lobotomizing the target creature, which also won't be able to use its skill without aether quanta, and 0 atk... Well, it can be fixed, but you can be creative

G2G, maybe tomorrow I'll have some cool idea to help balance this card (only if you want me to help).

[Onizuka]

Right now, as far as I can tell, this is what you want from this card

1) Aether to have a way to break through shields
2) A way to buff weaker creatures (Which also hurts high attack creatures)

Right now, my best suggestions are that this card
1) Does not make the ability purely aether based (Like I said, the same element as the card's)
2) Something like 2/3rds attack rounded down (Something like a burrow time thing) (Ex. A ruby dragon would have an ability to deal 5 damage at the cost of 2 fire quanta)
3) Increase the cost relative to the attack decrease.

[Rutarete]

Then you still have the problem of lobotomizing the target creature, which also won't be able to use its skill without aether quanta, and 0 atk... Well, it can be fixed, but you can be creative

G2G, maybe tomorrow I'll have some cool idea to help balance this card (only if you want me to help).

Any suggestions you have are welcomed

[Rutarete]

Right now, as far as I can tell, this is what you want from this card

1) Aether to have a way to break through shields
2) A way to buff weaker creatures (Which also hurts high attack creatures)

Right now, my best suggestions are that this card
1) Does not make the ability purely aether based (Like I said, the same element as the card's)
2) Something like 2/3rds attack rounded down (Something like a burrow time thing) (Ex. A ruby dragon would have an ability to deal 5 damage at the cost of 2 fire quanta)
3) Increase the cost relative to the attack decrease.

I actually made this focusing on #2.
now for the suggestions
1) I think krathos also suggested that one. Now that i reconsider it, it could work
2) This option really only effects the bigger creatures whose attacks have at least 3 multiples of 3 (9 at the least), so let's try to think of a variation of this that has a mostly equal effect on all types of creatures
3) Perhaps just a cost raise in general for the card, and make the ability of the card cost 2 of the element - as in suggestion 1

[Rutarete]

Edit:
Series link added.
The ability no longer lobotomizes the creature and instead makes the effect the element of whatever it targets.
Damage change from 2 | 3 to 3 | 5
Comments on these changes?

[ZephyrPhantom]

As you requested, here is Telenergy's art:
EDIT - Whoops, forgot to credit Kamietsu for the original Elements vectors. ^^;

[Rutarete]

As you requested, here is Teleenergy's art:

Whoa! Awesom +1 for you 

[ZephyrPhantom]

As you requested, here is Teleenergy's art:

Whoa! Awesom +1 for you 

Thanks!

[Rutarete]

So, Z, what are your thoughts about the card?

[ZephyrPhantom]

Like Nepy said, I would probably rather use momentum, but it's alternative use as CC does seem to justify a slightly higher cost. My intuition tells me that a cost of 4 | 3 isn't that bad - You'd still need multiple novas to use it and it can be counterproductive when used the wrong way.

[Rutarete]

Last bump before crucible submission;
New Wording has been added.
Card Image will be added by tomorrow.
Any last comments?

Edit: Submitted