(http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/6976/singularity1.png) | (http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/7317/singularity2.png) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Really, is this card that useless?Extremely.
Draining all your :gravity but draining all opponent quanta would be extremely OP, right?
Why have singularity be a separate card if black holes already have them? :DI'm trying to design those drain-all-quanta spells. Singularity is the one for Gravity.
Just noticed this, and it's picky on my end, but isn't "all your :gravity are consumed" followed by "both players lose all quanta" redundant?its to make it fit in with the All your _____ quantums are consumed
I'm pretty indifferent to the card as it is, I could see it being put to decent use, and horribly backfiring.On the deviantART page, it tells you whether you can use the image or not. For my other card, Corruption, the image had a license beneath it; I've read the license carefully, and made sure that I am allowed to use that image and edit it. For this image, I see no license; what tells me that I can't use it?
I'd like to add, though, that while using another artist's work is already ruffling my feathers, using it and editing it is a reason to get pretty pissed off. I suggest you either use original work, get permission from the author, or use royalty-free images such as this one (http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1043032) or this one (http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1099574). Those are free to edit, too.
The very fact that it isn't released under a license. This means it's released under applicable copyright law, as the '©2007-2010 ~HaylieNowak' implies.I'm pretty indifferent to the card as it is, I could see it being put to decent use, and horribly backfiring.On the deviantART page, it tells you whether you can use the image or not. For my other card, Corruption, the image had a license beneath it; I've read the license carefully, and made sure that I am allowed to use that image and edit it. For this image, I see no license; what tells me that I can't use it?
I'd like to add, though, that while using another artist's work is already ruffling my feathers, using it and editing it is a reason to get pretty pissed off. I suggest you either use original work, get permission from the author, or use royalty-free images such as this one (http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1043032) or this one (http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1099574). Those are free to edit, too.
To me, it seems that those images with the "buy this print" tags are not for me to use. But basically you're saying that NOTHING on deviantART is usable, UNLESS it has that license? I find that highly unlikely. So you're basically saying that if I make a random doodle in Paint, and submit it to deviantART, then nobody is allowed to use that doodle?That is exactly what the law says, yes.
I think the "All your :gravity are consumed" is a very unnecessary line. It consumes all of your quanta anyway!Touche.
I think the "All your :gravity are consumed" is a very unnecessary line. It consumes all of your quanta anyway!This.
Also, I don't think Zanz wants a series of this cards. I mean, if he wanted one, they would all have the same rarity, and Fractal didn't even start like that. That was just balancing.None can read the Divine mind that is Zanzarino. Who knows, maybe he didn't want one initially, but after making Fractal he started to want one? ;)
I think this card is OP. Not the cost, simply what it does. Imagine this in Dark Matters hand...Then Dark Matter would wipe his own quanta pool as well. And considering that he's a FG, I'd bet that he loses more quanta than you.
I'll do the card image and chart after dinner, in two or three hours."What's more powerful than a Black Hole? Then I thought of a singularity, a point of zero volume and infinite density." - It's thought that a singularity exist within a Black Hole, and therefore they're sorta the same thing, just that it's deeper inside of it. Also, density is mass over volume, therefore with 0 volume, and just 1 mass you can achieve an undefined value of density. However, even then the gravitational force will be very minimal because the mass is so low. Gravitational force is a function of mass, not density, so it's only stronger when the mass is greater. Also, although gravity has black hole already, there's also quasars. Which are extreme versions of black holes (they suck in entire galaxies while black holes only do solar systems, and this is responsible for the massive gamma radiation that strikes out Earth). Also, black holes are thought to be mass to energy converters, so why not add a small healing bit? =P Not too much though. Don't want to lose its usefulness ^^
OK, this is another card in the drain-all-quanta series; this card drains all :gravity. I already made a card that drains all :darkness:
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,5448.0.htmlWhen I made this card, I thought: Gravity already has Black Hole. What's more powerful than a Black Hole? Then I thought of a singularity, a point of zero volume and infinite density. To fit the name of "singular", the card Singularity leaves each player with one singular quantum of their Marks.
(http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/6976/singularity1.png) (http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/7317/singularity2.png)
NAME: Singularity ELEMENT: Gravity COST: 11 :gravity TYPE: Spell ATT/HP: - ABILITY: All your :gravity are consumed.
Both players lose all quanta, then both players gain 1 quantum of his or her Mark.. NOTES: For example, if your Mark is Earth, then when you use this card, you lose all quanta then gain 1 :earth. ART BY: HaylieNowak IDEA BY: Bloodshadow
NAME: Singularity ELEMENT: Gravity COST: 9 :gravity TYPE: Spell ATT/HP: - ABILITY: All your :gravity are consumed.
Both players lose all quanta, then both players gain 1 quantum of his or her Mark.. NOTES: For example, if your Mark is Earth, then when you use this card, you lose all quanta then gain 1 :earth. ART BY: HaylieNowak IDEA BY: Bloodshadow
Is this card overpowered?
BTW, link to original art:
http://haylienowak.deviantart.com/art/Lone-Singularity-59627410
The problem I have with this card is that if you EVER have the upper hand, this can ensure you keep it.That, by itself, doesn't make this card OP. If you can't keep your upper hand, that means you don't have the upper hand after all.