Shrine of Vesta | Tribunal Altar

[TimerClock14]

NAME: Shrine of Vesta ELEMENT: Fire COST: 3 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 0|5 TEXT: Generate 1 and 1 per turn. If targeted with Immolation, give bonus quantum.	NAME: Tribunal Altar ELEMENT: Fire COST: 3 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 0|7 TEXT: Generate 1 and 1 per turn. If targeted with Cremation, give bonus quantum.

ART: TimerClock14 IDEA: TimerClock14 NOTES: When targeted with Immo/Cremation, the bonus quantum is calculated based off of the opponents quantum totals, and your quantum totals. I'll post the functions later. SERIES: TimerClock's Para-Elemental Creature Series (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,13822.0.html)

[ddevans96]

hm....I'm wondering if any of these cards would have a place in duo decks. For example this in say, a fractal phoenix deck, or cloud in a freeze/shockwave control deck.

[AnonymousRevival]

Man, Timer, you post these cards quick!

[Hyroen]

Tribunal Altar + Rage Elixer + Quintessence = Epic

[TimerClock14]

these cards could actually give birth to an explosion of decks without pillars and use these instead. That might just crash the forums (and maybe SG too) We'd have to devote a whole child board to these decks haha.

@anonymous: yea if I have the card and the image all i gotta do is slap 'em together and boom! you got yerself a card ready for submission. This is why i'm so desperate for art.

[AnonymousRevival]

Well, it wouldn't exactly be a spam, just as long as you don't start a new post of updated versions that's all.

[TimerClock14]

I'll be linking these to crucible 5 at a time. so i need to submit 2 more. The problem is, none of these cards have any problems:as voiced by the community, so the unspoken rule that every card must have been changed at least once kind of worries me.

[Drobbit]

I'll be linking these to crucible 5 at a time. so i need to submit 2 more. The problem is, none of these cards have any problems:as voiced by the community, so the unspoken rule that every card must have been changed at least once kind of worries me.

If you want a change, here you have an input:
I'm worried about what you talked about the decks without pillars. I think that pillars are the base of the game and I don't like to remove them. If your cards go through it would be a possibility (I know that there are pillarless decks by the way, but they use specific strategy).

So, I suggest to pay for the quanta like happens with creatures like Rustler. You could pay with 0/-1 for each two quantas ( and  in this case) so you'll have to use healing creatures like angels to keep gaining quanta or gain quanta after a succesful hit so you'll have to use blessing or momentum. I don't know... I'm throwing ideas to the wind... but just produce quanta without constraint...

[TimerClock14]

i understand where you're coming from, thanks for the feedback by the way, but if you think about it: damselfly, gemfinders, and even RoLs are the near single-element equivalents of these cards. they have low(if any) cost and produce quanta without constraint as well. these cards are the same but doubled up with 2 elements, cost and life.

[Xrbeta]

Does this card still has its effect if its frozen? other then that i think its hp is a little to high for something that can be potentially very dangerous.

[AnonymousRevival]

Well, it sholdn't because freeze depletes all skills, unless it is passive.

[Drobbit]

i understand where you're coming from, thanks for the feedback by the way, but if you think about it: damselfly, gemfinders, and even RoLs are the near single-element equivalents of these cards. they have low(if any) cost and produce quanta without constraint as well. these cards are the same but doubled up with 2 elements, cost and life.

You are right. No objection then