Pixie | Pixie

[russianspy1234]

NAME: Pixie ELEMENT: Air COST: 3 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 3 | 3 TEXT: If a permanents of yours is destroyed by opponent, autocast this card for free.   :Revitalize a creature.	NAME: Pixie ELEMENT: Air COST: 2 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 3 | 3 TEXT: If a permanents of yours is destroyed by opponent, autocast this card for free.   :Revitalize a creature.

ART: http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1159069 recolered IDEA: russianspy1234 NOTES: As with the others, one autocast trigger per event, no matter how many are in hand. Decided to move away from the whole "lol this is tinkerbell" theme in favor of a more generic pixie/fairy theme. Revitalize means bring it back to its default state (remove all statuses/damage/buffs/mutation) Not sure how it would interact with a chimera, would probably require a special case. Offensive use against opponent is incidental.  Is it balanced? SERIES: Autocast

[esran]

i like it, but i think to balance the auto cast maechanic you should raise the cost by 1. also, i think that you should raise the stats and the cost, to make this card more relevant.

[russianspy1234]

i like it, but i think to balance the auto cast maechanic you should raise the cost by 1. also, i think that you should raise the stats and the cost, to make this card more relevant.

i dont want to raise the attack much, but yes raising the cost is probably good... what if i make the ability also grant dive?  though giving aether a semi lobo effect is probably wasted so i might say "and grand dive if it has no ability"? theres a bit of a problem with lack of room.

[Xamuel]

[Annele]

Tinkerbell has finally decided to wear something other than that leaf...

Cool card. I don't think to would be too unbalanced if if you could destroy one of your own permanents to cast it. It's like sacrificing a pillar for a 3/3 creature. And you have to pay for the sacrifice (unless of course you use SoF).

[OldTrees]

i like it, but i think to balance the auto cast maechanic you should raise the cost by 1. also, i think that you should raise the stats and the cost, to make this card more relevant.

i dont want to raise the attack much, but yes raising the cost is probably good... what if i make the ability also grant dive?  though giving aether a semi lobo effect is probably wasted so i might say "and grand dive if it has no ability"? theres a bit of a problem with lack of room.

How cheaply do you want your opponent to have a diving Sky Dragon?

[russianspy1234]

i like it, but i think to balance the auto cast maechanic you should raise the cost by 1. also, i think that you should raise the stats and the cost, to make this card more relevant.

i dont want to raise the attack much, but yes raising the cost is probably good... what if i make the ability also grant dive?  though giving aether a semi lobo effect is probably wasted so i might say "and grand dive if it has no ability"? theres a bit of a problem with lack of room.

How cheaply do you want your opponent to have a diving Sky Dragon?

Not at all... Just airborne it is.

Tinkerbell has finally decided to wear something other than that leaf...

Cool card. I don't think to would be too unbalanced if if you could destroy one of your own permanents to cast it. It's like sacrificing a pillar for a 3/3 creature. And you have to pay for the sacrifice (unless of course you use SoF).

Thing is, Air has unstable gas, which would make bringing this out for free too easy.

[Poker Alho]

but your card specifically says that autocast only activates if it was the opponent who destroyed a permanent, so UG or auto-destroying a pillar wouldnt work...

[russianspy1234]

but your card specifically says that autocast only activates if it was the opponent who destroyed a permanent, so UG or auto-destroying a pillar wouldnt work...

right, i was responding to annelle who suggested letting it activate if you destroyed one yourself.

[esran]

i think you could make it a 4/4 without problem, and i think you should raise the cost and make it a 4/6 of something.

[russianspy1234]

i think you could make it a 4/4 without problem, and i think you should raise the cost and make it a 4/6 of something.

should a simple pixie really be that strong though?

[Annele]

Tinkerbell has finally decided to wear something other than that leaf...

Cool card. I don't think to would be too unbalanced if if you could destroy one of your own permanents to cast it. It's like sacrificing a pillar for a 3/3 creature. And you have to pay for the sacrifice (unless of course you use SoF).

Thing is, Air has unstable gas, which would make bringing this out for free too easy.

I mean actually destroying it, not just sacrificing it, or have it run out (sundial, bone wall, diss shield etc.)