Camouflage | Camouflage

[Rutarete]

yah, you have this out (as a permanent)- wait! that means you need an activating cost!- and you can just quint. your creature, un-quint. it to cast blessing on it or somethingg, and quint. it again. in that case, it should only be able to be used once per turn. or as a spell, even with having 6 of them you could only use the full effect 3 times

No you don't. Target a creature. This creature will be invisible until Camoflauge is removed.

Cloak wasn't uncodable was it? This is just like Cloak, but for 1 creature.

Thanks for catching me there. I still say that this should be a permanent, because not everyone runs cards that remove invisibility.

why would you want to remove it?

Because, why do you quint creatures? To protect them. By making this card vulnerable to PC, it becomes balanced.

i think you're missing the point here. the card makes them invisible, not quintessential. so while your opponent can't see your invisible creature, why would you want them too by removing it?

[ZephyrPhantom]

Umm.... because real-life Camo can be removed?

It's just my few  on the matter. You don't have to listen to it.

Neverthless, point well proved. I guess it makes a better spell, with one problem. Unlike Quint, we can't even see the creature, so how will we know what it's current stats are?  That could get really annoying if the creature gets mass buffed, ability swapped, or mutated.

[Amilir]

As is, an underpowered quintessence.  Because you have to cast the creature before you camo it, the invisibility is of no use.  It could be still be useful, just because it doesn't take aether quanta.

[grindpower]

Umm.... because real-life Camo can be removed?

It's just my few  on the matter. You don't have to listen to it.

Neverthless, point well proved. I guess it makes a better spell, with one problem. Unlike Quint, we can't even see the creature, so how will we know what it's current stats are?  That could get really annoying if the creature gets mass buffed, ability swapped, or mutated.

If you use Cloak you can see your own creatures but your opponent can't.

Your opponent will still know if it's mass buffed because they will see the damage attack their health.

I guess mutation/ability swap would be annoying, but at least they will know it's not a hack if the opponent is creating life quanta/entropy quanta.

[Rutarete]

Umm.... because real-life Camo can be removed?

It's just my few  on the matter. You don't have to listen to it.

Neverthless, point well proved. I guess it makes a better spell, with one problem. Unlike Quint, we can't even see the creature, so how will we know what it's current stats are?  That could get really annoying if the creature gets mass buffed, ability swapped, or mutated.

well, i suppose you can know somewhat if it's being buffed, based on the cards they play from their hand

[Kuroaitou]

CURATOR COMMENT
-Leave the ATK|HP section of the table blank if the card is not a creature (don't use 'N/A' to fill it in)

[AnonymousRevival]

This card seems to be the version of another person's card idea. Submerge.

[ZephyrPhantom]

This card seems to be the version of another person's card idea. Submerge.

And.... when does Submerge make a card invisible?

[Rutarete]

This card seems to be the version of another person's card idea. Submerge.

And.... when does Submerge make a card invisible?

well, it depends on how deep you go

[Werdbooty]

Okay, not to be a grammar nazi, but can the name of this card be corrected before it goes any further? It's "Camouflage." The 'u' is in the wrong place.