Gluttony | Gluttony

[Drake_XIV]

NAME: Gluttony ELEMENT: Gravity COST: 6 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Target creature gains Gluttony.  Once per turn, it can devour a creature.  If it does not, it takes -1|-2.	NAME: Gluttony ELEMENT: Gravity COST: 5 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Target creature gains Gluttony.  Once per turn, it can devour a creature.  If it does not, it takes -1|-2.

ART: duchesssa [http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1284217] IDEA: Drake_XIV NOTES: The cost of Gluttony is equal to the target's max health divided by 3.  Rounds up.  It costs . SERIES: Seven Deadly Sins

[esran]

the card looks pretty good, the first problem i can see is that creatures can activate their bilities without targets. this has been used to explout sofos and other cards. im not sure if it would make this card not work.

[Drake_XIV]

No, because the ability will only work if it does not gain the stats from Devouring.  Essentially, it's either +1|+1 or -1|-1.

[furballdn]

Sounds very similar to the appetite stimulant idea.

[Drake_XIV]

Yeah, but unless I remembering stimulant incorrectly, there is no downside for not Devouring.

[n00b]

Armedilgo approves of this card.

[Drake_XIV]

Armedilgo approves of this card.

Because 9 Devour is so nice looking.

[OdinVanguard]

Will the devour ability that is granted be of the same type as the creature to use? If not, what type of quanta will be needed?

[MiasmicBound]

I love the card but in actual fact if you played against this card i'd hate it.
I guess, its roughly balanced though. It's a do or die (well -1|-1) situation.

[Drake_XIV]

Will the devour ability that is granted be of the same type as the creature to use? If not, what type of quanta will be needed?

Well, the idea was to put it in , which I have so conveniently forgotten to add to the notes...

[Pineapple]

With SoR, it wouldn't make much of a difference if you switched the ability cost from variable to constant. Plus, if it were constant, you could add the cost into the card text.

[Chapuz]

gluton armagio > armored Oty.