Glaring Light | Fulgent Light

[Drake_XIV]

Wow! First card into the crucible! I feel that's some sort of accomplishment for me even though others have probably had hundreds get in 

Yeah, I'll go capitalize light and change that later when I get some time. Like tomorrow or something.

I'm rather surprised you actually haven't gotten any other cards into the system yet.  Congrats on your first one then.

[furballdn]

Wow! First card into the crucible! I feel that's some sort of accomplishment for me even though others have probably had hundreds get in 

Yeah, I'll go capitalize light and change that later when I get some time. Like tomorrow or something.

I'm rather surprised you actually haven't gotten any other cards into the system yet.  Congrats on your first one then.

Main problem when making cards is probably getting art

[zaxiva]

I feel like this is a good idea, but probably a little overwhelming. It seems that this card is way to easy to use, since it costs so little light quantum, and could be pilled in a deck and used sorta like dimensional shield but more powerful. If you had 10 light creatures on the field (which is very common in a light deck) and used this, it could be game over, especially if this card shows up more then once. 

[zaxiva]

My above comment was directed towards EMERALD TIGER

[Hyroen]

My above comment was directed towards EMERALD TIGER

The modify button is designed to edit posts. Please use that as opposed to double-posting. ^_^

[zaxiva]

My above comment was directed towards EMERALD TIGER

The modify button is designed to edit posts. Please use that as opposed to double-posting. ^_^

For sure. Still getting used to the system.

[ARTHANASIOS]

Does this card target only creatures or it can target permanents as well? 

[Drake_XIV]

According to the Notes, it also targets Permanents.

[ARTHANASIOS]

According to the Notes, it also targets Permanents.

So, we can have a Rol/Hope deck that delays creatures or permanents for 24 turns with just a minimal amount of light quanta?
Awesome idea, but completely OP.

[Drake_XIV]

Is it?  Because by the time you get there, it's clear whose won or lost...  And you can only have up to 6 targets, but in order to do that with a standard RoL/Hope, you'd have to give up healing or offense.

[ARTHANASIOS]

Is it?  Because by the time you get there, it's clear whose won or lost...  And you can only have up to 6 targets, but in order to do that with a standard RoL/Hope, you'd have to give up healing or offense.

Ok, it is not completely OP, but it is OP in my opinion. Rol/Hope is a pretty good deck IMO and now we give it a Freeze or BB early in game and an 'instant kill' later in the game. Furthermore, it can also shut permanents, and that's the main reason of its OPness.

[furballdn]

Is it?  Because by the time you get there, it's clear whose won or lost...  And you can only have up to 6 targets, but in order to do that with a standard RoL/Hope, you'd have to give up healing or offense.

Ok, it is not completely OP, but it is OP in my opinion. Rol/Hope is a pretty good deck IMO and now we give it a Freeze or BB early in game and an 'instant kill' later in the game. Furthermore, it can also shut permanents, and that's the main reason of its OPness.

A RoL/hope deck will either only have a paltry amount of RoLs on the field, or a massive amount. I do not see how shutting down permanents makes it OP. What is wrong with giving some PC? If this card were to be added into a RoL/hope, it'd cause quite a big revamp of the deck since RoL/hope is already packed with cards and adding more might stabilize it.

Could you please tell me why you feel giving some soft CC/PC would be OP?