Gift of Nature | Enharmonic Aura

[ZephyrPhantom]

NAME: Gift of Nature ELEMENT: Life COST: 7 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: All your creatures gain the passive ability "Vitality" : Creatures with Vitality get +2 | +2.	NAME: Enharmonic Aura ELEMENT: Life COST: 5  TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: All your creatures gain the passive ability "Vitality" : Creatures with Vitality get +2 | +2.

ART: Zblader Sources: Zanzarino for original Life Mark and Kamietsu for Vector version of said mark. IDEA: Zblader NOTES: Most of the time it appears that mass-buffing is presented through new "field" permanents that provide a field-wide effect similar to Flooding or Eclipse. This card provides a different take on the "mass-buff" mechanic by making it a spell which also makes it a different take on the concept of AoE spells. Since a passive ability cannot stack, you can still use this spell to buff newly played creatures but at the same time it won't stack (Special Thanks to ddevans96 for this idea). SERIES:

NAME: Gift of Nature ELEMENT: Life COST: 7  TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: All your creatures gain +2 | +2.	NAME: Enharmonic Aura ELEMENT: Life COST: 5  TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: All your creatures gain +2 | +2.

ART: Zblader Sources: Zanzarino for original Life Mark and Kamietsu for Vector version of said mark. IDEA: Zblader NOTES: Most of the time it appears that mass-buffing is presented through new "field" permanents that provide a field-wide effect similar to Flooding or Eclipse. This card provides a different take on the "mass-buff" mechanic by making it a spell which also makes it a different take on the concept of AoE spells. SERIES:

[Nepycros]

Impressive. 7|5 Giant Frogs, one for 8 , 2 for 10 , etc. etc. up to around 6 in a deck, for about... 18 , equal to 35 damage... since that's 7 cards... Sounds about right. I have no corrections, although my instincts tell me to raise the cost EXACTLY 1... Just instinct.

On another note, Bloodshadow's Duality card is peculiar. Using only a duo, you can allow a deck that, using Eclipse, causes Giant Frog rushes to become 7|4 creatures, and with this, 9|6 creatures, and you can run it in a normal duo!

Add a note that it does not stack.

[ZephyrPhantom]

Impressive. 7|5 Giant Frogs, one for 8 , 2 for 10 , etc. etc. up to around 6 in a deck, for about... 18 , equal to 35 damage... since that's 7 cards... Sounds about right. I have no corrections, although my instincts tell me to raise the cost EXACTLY 1... Just instinct. Probably inuition from RoF. I think the cost is still up for discussion otherwise.

On another note, Bloodshadow's Duality card is peculiar. Using only a duo, you can allow a deck that, using Eclipse, causes Giant Frog rushes to become 7|4 creatures, and with this, 9|6 creatures, and you can run it in a normal duo!

Add a note that it does not stack. It's a spell, how can it not stack? XD

[Nepycros]

Impressive. 7|5 Giant Frogs, one for 8 , 2 for 10 , etc. etc. up to around 6 in a deck, for about... 18 , equal to 35 damage... since that's 7 cards... Sounds about right. I have no corrections, although my instincts tell me to raise the cost EXACTLY 1... Just instinct. Probably inuition from RoF. I think the cost is still up for discussion otherwise.

On another note, Bloodshadow's Duality card is peculiar. Using only a duo, you can allow a deck that, using Eclipse, causes Giant Frog rushes to become 7|4 creatures, and with this, 9|6 creatures, and you can run it in a normal duo!

Add a note that it does not stack. It's a spell, how can it not stack? XD

-_- Yeaaaaah, a cost of 7 is JUST about right. No matter how you look at it, a Frogtal deck just doesn't need this buff without some repercussions.

[ZephyrPhantom]

-_- Yeaaaaah, a cost of 7 is JUST about right. No matter how you look at it, a Frogtal deck just doesn't need this buff without some repercussions.

Good point. Cost raised to 7 .

[ddevans96]

It's a spell, how can it not stack? XD

Good question. For one thing, it could give creatures a passive or a status that disallows the addition of stats when the card is played again.

[ZephyrPhantom]

It's a spell, how can it not stack? XD

Good question. For one thing, it could give creatures a passive or a status that disallows the addition of stats when the card is played again.

Interesting thought. Would stacking be OP? (Added a poll on this as well)

[Rutarete]

It's a spell, how can it not stack? XD

Good question. For one thing, it could give creatures a passive or a status that disallows the addition of stats when the card is played again.

Interesting thought. Would stacking be OP? (Added a poll on this as well)

I feel it would be, for i'm imagining giant dragons and such with this card.

[Sevs]

This is stronger than eclipse, cant be undone with PC and stacks

On another note it does not effect cards that are played after. it seems kinda strong and might be a little OP as a mass buff with 0 attack creatures like deathstalker and dune scorpion.

Although without teasting available i cant back anything i said up so just speculation

[Nepycros]

This is stronger than eclipse, cant be undone with PC, stacks and doesnt effect another

On another note it does not effect cards that are played after. it seems kinda strong and might be a little OP as a mass buff with 0 attack creatures like deathstalker and dune scorpion.

Although without teasting available i cant back anything i said up so just speculation

Indeed, a trio deck of Time, Life, and Death would ultimately receive a massive buff.

[ZephyrPhantom]

Based on the results of the poll , I've changed the effect so that creatures now gain the passive ability "Vitality", which gives a +2 | +2 stat boost. Since passives can't stack, this prevents the spell from stacking but it can be used again to buff newly played creatures. Thanks ddevans for the passive idea.

[Nepycros]

Based on the results of the poll , I've changed the effect so that creatures now gain the passive ability "Vitality", which gives a +2 | +2 stat boost. Since passives can't stack, this prevents the spell from stacking but it can be used again to buff newly played creatures. Thanks ddevans for the passive idea.

Intense! That's the perfect thing. The cost can go down to 6|4 because of that, however.