Gentle Breeze | Strong Breeze

[Drobbit]

NAME: Gentle Breeze ELEMENT: Air COST: 8 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Water, Air and Airborne creatures attack twice this turn.	NAME: Strong Breeze ELEMENT: Air COST: 6 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Water, Air and Airborne creatures attack twice this turn.

ART: http://angher.blogspot.com/ IDEA: Drobbit and Liruken NOTES: Opponent's creatures also gain this skill for one turn. SERIES: Quantum Pirates (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,16370.msg223712#msg223712)

[Drobbit]

No comments for this card? That means you like it like that or you don't like it at all?

[AnonymousRevival]

Airborne, not airborn.

[Ajit]

I kind of like it, nothing glaringly wrong with it at all in my opinion.

[Drobbit]

Sent to the crucible link

[Kuroaitou]

The problem with this card is two fold in my opinion:

1. Not exactly sure why Water creature should reap the benefit from a Gentle or Strong Breeze. If they're underwater, why should the wind improve their offensive prowess?

2. Sky Blitz basically does the same thing, excluding the Water creature part...

Nonetheless, it's still approved for the Crucible.

[Drobbit]

The problem with this card is two fold in my opinion:

1. Not exactly sure why Water creature should reap the benefit from a Gentle or Strong Breeze. If they're underwater, why should the wind improve their offensive prowess?

2. Sky Blitz basically does the same thing, excluding the Water creature part...

Nonetheless, it's still approved for the Crucible.

1.- is for the pirate theme. Ships are affected by winds and they go by water.
2.- is much better to double the attack (sky blizz) than attack twice, because of the shields. This card is though for the pirates, to steal more quantum this attack rather than do more damage.

[Drobbit]

Indeed I don't want it to be in the crucible if you think it's usless. I put it here just to get suggestions to improve the idea. How do you think it could fit in air and in my quantum pirate serie.