Flame Ray | Burning Ray

[Drake_XIV]

Sure, why not?  That'd make for an Element-esque creature that could still use the ability.

[whatifidogetcaught?]

Sure, why not?  That'd make for an Element-esque creature that could still use the ability.

A magma ray? Or does that semi-tread on Lava Golem and sound  y?

[Drake_XIV]

Not at all, but I'd think you'd want to keep the Solar connection.

[whatifidogetcaught?]

Not at all, but I'd think you'd want to keep the Solar connection.

Yeah, for extreme heat. Solar Ray just sounds a little hokey though. Other than the fact that it is a sting ray from the sun.

[storyteller]

Flame Ray | Burning Ray

[Annele]

This is really cool, and increases  's synergy with  . (Ruby dragon + chaos power is epic)
AND  is opposite to  , whose creatures this hurts the most.


I don't really like it being a creature though.  already has many creatures, and only has 2 permanents (exluding pillar/pends), and one of them is rare.
If it was a permanent, the name could be something like Broken Furnace | Unbalanced Furnace. I just love the idea of a furnace spitting random fireballs at my opponent's creatures  .

[neuroleptics]

This is really cool, and increases  's synergy with  . (Ruby dragon + chaos power is epic)
AND  is opposite to  , whose creatures this hurts the most.


I don't really like it being a creature though.  already has many creatures, and only has 2 permanents (exluding pillar/pends), and one of them is rare.
If it was a permanent, the name could be something like Broken Furnace | Unbalanced Furnace. I just love the idea of a furnace spitting random fireballs at my opponent's creatures  .

That name sounded pretty cool. after the recent seraph introduction, i don't think any more creature assign to fire is necessary

[Poker Alho]

This is really cool, and increases  's synergy with  . (Ruby dragon + chaos power is epic)
AND  is opposite to  , whose creatures this hurts the most.


I don't really like it being a creature though.  already has many creatures, and only has 2 permanents (exluding pillar/pends), and one of them is rare.
If it was a permanent, the name could be something like Broken Furnace | Unbalanced Furnace. I just love the idea of a furnace spitting random fireballs at my opponent's creatures  .

you're right  fire does have a lack of permanents when compared to some elements, although that actually makes sense thematically (the same goes for entropy)

and actually,  and  have 4 permanents each, you forgot pillars and pends

[whatifidogetcaught?]

This is really cool, and increases  's synergy with  . (Ruby dragon + chaos power is epic)
AND  is opposite to  , whose creatures this hurts the most.


I don't really like it being a creature though.  already has many creatures, and only has 2 permanents (exluding pillar/pends), and one of them is rare.
If it was a permanent, the name could be something like Broken Furnace | Unbalanced Furnace. I just love the idea of a furnace spitting random fireballs at my opponent's creatures  .

you're right  fire does have a lack of permanents when compared to some elements, although that actually makes sense thematically (the same goes for entropy)

and actually,  and  have 4 permanents each, you forgot pillars and pends

He said excluding pillars and pends =p

I understand it has a LOT of creatures, but that's the theme, and a permanent or spell just doesn't seem appropriate.

[Poker Alho]

This is really cool, and increases  's synergy with  . (Ruby dragon + chaos power is epic)
AND  is opposite to  , whose creatures this hurts the most.


I don't really like it being a creature though.  already has many creatures, and only has 2 permanents (exluding pillar/pends), and one of them is rare.
If it was a permanent, the name could be something like Broken Furnace | Unbalanced Furnace. I just love the idea of a furnace spitting random fireballs at my opponent's creatures  .

you're right  fire does have a lack of permanents when compared to some elements, although that actually makes sense thematically (the same goes for entropy)

and actually,  and  have 4 permanents each, you forgot pillars and pends

He said excluding pillars and pends =p

I understand it has a LOT of creatures, but that's the theme, and a permanent or spell just doesn't seem appropriate.

me = dumb for not paying attention to what others write

but i would like to see an extra permanent in fire, just cuz

[whatifidogetcaught?]

I dunno, if it were to change it would definitely be a spell =p

Besides, that would be a crazy permanent.

[Poker Alho]

I dunno, if it were to change it would definitely be a spell =p

Besides, that would be a crazy permanent.

nah leave as it is, the card as a creature works perfectly, i was more talking about making another card lol