Falling Rocks | Cave In

[Calindu]

Click here to add title?Better fix that!

[MartyrX]

Click here to add title?Better fix that!

Good Looking Out Mate ???

[Mithcairion]

I'm curious, what brought you to the idea that the number of creatures an opponent controls should be the determining factor in the damage done?  I don't dislike the idea, it is simply a bit different (to someone who doesn't browse the CI&A boards much) and I'm not quite sure if it fits or could possibly be tweaked thematically.  Balance-wise, it certainly doesn't feel OP to me, and probably even UP, considering most times you don't have more than 6-8 creatures out in a game unless of course Fractal is involved.  For that reason, I would consider either reducing the costs or changing the damage mechanism (maybe 5+X damage, or the like?).

[mrtwigie01]

I don't like the name "total cave in" for upgraded
maybe total collapse??

[furballdn]

What about a cooler sounding name? Mudslide? Tectonic slip? Avalanche?

[oblivion1212]

Fissure? Ground Break? Tunnel Drive?

meh, don't really like "Cave In", sounds to be based on terrain.. (yep, pointing at pillars)

awesome card, dood..
pretty card art 

[Sevs]

At the cost it is at, I would probably never use it, but the card idea itself with that mechanism is very interesting. For the unupgraded, I would possibly either 2X damage or include both like the upped but with higher cost.

[Toxx]

Such a good card idea. I suggest perhaps the opponent creatures should be delayed for one turn after it's activation to go with the "Cave In" theme although this card is great how it is. Maybe a name change to something like "Quake" would be good also. You have my vote!